Case Details

Citation(s)
1979 SLG 225 1979 SLD 225 1979 PLD 465
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petitions Nos. D 994, D 1065 and D 1066 of 1978, decided on 22nd October 1978.
ABDUL HAYEE KURESHI AND S. A. NUSRAT, JJ
Rashid Akhutrd for Petitioner. Usman Ghani for A. G. with Abbas H. Farooqul for
Respondents.

MUHAMMAD ASHFAQVS

Mar courtTIAL LAW ADMINISTRATOR, ZONE €œC€, KARACHI AND 5 OTHERS --Respondents

Law:

Section:

(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) S. 173 Report with regard to commission of a cognizable offence lodged in Police Station Does not ipso facto ripen into a case Such report has to be investigated and may or may not result in submission of final challan in Court under S. 173. [First Information Report¬ Cognizable offence]. (b) Sind Prohibition Ordinance (IV of 1978) -- Ss. 3 & 4 Mere possession of liquor Held, not an offence accord¬ing to Ordinance. [Possession]. (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Art. 199 Jurisdiction of High Court under Art. 199 Court not-----called upon to go into investigation of facts. [Jurisdiction]. [p. 470]C Begun Nasrat Bhutto v. Chief of Army Staff any another P L D 1977 S C 657 and Z. A. Bhutto v. The State P L D 1978 S C 40 ref. (d) Martial Law Order, 1977 [M. L. A. Zone 'C'] No. 4 [as reconstituted by Martial Law Order No. 37 of 1978], read with Pakistan Army Act Rules, 1954 Martial Law Courts ¬-Courts of expediency and exigency Such Courts, however, required to act within limits laid down in M. L. O. No. 4 as to jurisdiction and Pakistan Army Act Rules as to procedure Action of such Courts, so long as…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492