Case Details

Citation(s)
1985 SLG 3803 = 1985 SLD 3803 = 1985 PLJ 152
Sindh High Court
First Rent Appeal No. 123/1983, decided on 15-3-1984.
Presented By: ABDUL RAZAK A. THAHIM, J
Mr. Munawar Abbas, Advocate for Appellant, Mr, Raja Qureshi, Advocate for
Respondent, Dates of hearing : 8-2 and 4-3-1984,

Shah NASIR RIZVI—Appellant verius Begum SULTANA AHMED—Respondent

Law: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979

Section: 15,21

(i) Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)— ——Ss.15 & 21—Eviction—Order  of—Appeal against—Competency to institute proceedings — Objection regarding-Tenant    not raising objection regarding competency of landlady to file rent case in pleadings before Rent Controller—Held: Such iegai point? to be com­petently raised at appellate stage. [P. 155JAPLJ 1980 Karachi 248 ?ef. (ii) Sind Rented Premises Ordiaance (XVII of 1979)          ------ S,   15  (viij — Eviction  -Persona!   requirement— Bona fide of—Evidence of landlady remaining unchallenged—Held : Entire state­ment of landlady on her personal requirement and being landlady of property to be accepted (as correct). [P. 155]B & CP L J 198! Lah. 307 and 1980 C L C 1611 rtf. judgment This First Rent Appeal under Section 21 of Sind Rented Premises Ordi­nance 1979, (hereinafter referred to as Ordinance) has been filed against the order dated 16-1-1983, of Hod Senior Civil judge/Rent Controller Karachi whereby he directed the appellant to hand over the vacaoi possession of the premises to respondent. 2.  The facts of this case are that on 24-9-1981, Begum Sultana Ahmad Sled Rent case against her tenant  Shah  Nasir  Rizvi.    She  stated  in  her application under Section 15 (vii) of the Ordinance  that she is landlady of premises  bearing  No. I54-R   Khushha! Road Block-2, P E C H S Karachi and appellant is her tenant on ground floor.    She is living in Lohore where her youngest son was studying and now  after   ompleting   his  studies   has joined service.   She now wants to shift to Karachi,  where her  daughter  is also living with family, therefore, she requires the premises for her personal bonafide use. 3.        Appellant filed written statement in which  relationship  of tenaat and landlord is …
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register