Case Details

Citation(s)
2001 SLG 3131 = 2001 SLD 3131 = 2001 CLC 367
Lahore High Court
Writ Petitions Nos. 1522, 1538 and 1685 of 2000, decided on 22nd August, 2000.
Presented By: Maulvi Anwarul Haq, J
Amjad Hameed Ghauri for Petitioner. Raja Iftikhar Javed, Standing Counsel for the Federation.

MUHAMMAD ABU BAKAR AFTAB QURESHI---Petitioner

VERSUS

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION through Chairman, Islamabad and others---Respondents

Law: Companies (Asset Backed Securitization) Rules, 1999

Section: 199

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section:

Federal Public Service Commission Rules for Competitive Examination, 1999 7(viii)---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Vires of R.7(viii) of Federal Public Service Commission Rules for Competitive Examination, 1999---Re-evaluation of marks obtained in examination by the candidate---Candidate being dissatisfied with the result wanted to have his papers re-evaluated---Federal Public Service Commission turned down the demand of the candidate in view of R.7(viii) of the Federal Public Service Commission Rules for Competitive Examination, 1999-- Validity---Provision for re-evaluation or prohibition on re-evaluation in Calendars and Rules of Educational Institutions was not ultra vires of any law. Avadhani Meena and others v. Board of Secondary Education KLR 1982 CC 300; Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Lahore v. Mst. Salina Afroz and 2 others PLD 1992 SC 263; Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Lahore v. Sauna Azad 1996 SCMR 676 and Tahir Saeed Qureshi v. Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Sargodha and 3 others 1996 SCMR 1872 ref. Dates of hearing: 21st and 22nd August, 2000.                                                                                                                                                             JUDGMENT This judgment shall dispose of Writ Petitions Nos. 1522 of 2000, 1538 of 2000 and 1685 of 2000. The petitioners in all these three cases appeared in the Federal Public Service Commission, Competitive Examination, 1999. The cause of grievance in the said three petitions is as under: -- (i) Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 1522 of 2000 secured 3 out of 50 marks in English Essay; (ii) petitioner in Writ Petition No. 1535 of 2000 secured 36 out of 100 marks in Islamiat; while (iii)…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register