| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2004 SLG 3047 = 2004 SLD 3047 = 2004 PLJ 1224 |
W.P. No. 3482 of 2003, heard on 28.1.2004.
Presented By: TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JiLANI, J.
Malik Javaid Akhtar Wains, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. Muhammad Ramzan Khalid Joiya, Advocate for
Respondents. Mr. Muhammad Qasim Khan, AAG for State.
Mst. RAHIM BIBI alias RAHIM KHATOON and another-Petitioners
VERSUS
S.H.O. POLICE STATION SADDAR KEHROR DISTT., LODHRAN and 2 others-Respondents
Law: Enforcement of Hadd Order (4 of 1979)
Section: 16
Enforcement of Hadood Ordinance, 1979 (VII of 1979)-- —-S. 16 read with Muhammadan law by D.F. Mulla S. 268-C-Presumption of marriage-In Islamic law when a woman and man acknowledge their Nikah, a presumption of truth is attached to it-Marriage will he presumed, in absence of direct proof from, prolonged and continual cohabitation as husband and wife, the fact of acknowledgement by the man of the paternity of the child born to the woman, provided all the conditions of a valid acknowledgement are fulfilled Fact of the acknowledgement by the man as the woman as his wife-FIR quashed— Petitioners are husband and wife-Petition accepted. [Pp. 1227 & 1228] A, B, C & D Date of hearing: 28.1.2004. judgment Through this petition petitioners have sought quashment of the case registered vide FIR No. 312 dated 8.8.2003 under Section 16/7/79 Hudood Ordinance P.S. Saddar Kehror Pacca, Petitioners admittedly are first cousin & they claim to be husband & wife in terms of Nikahnama dated 10.7.2003, 2. The prosecution story as given in the afore-referred FIR registered on the statement of Muhammad Nawaz who is father of Petitioner No. 1 briefly stated is that he had married his daughter (Petitioner No. 1) with his nephew Allah Wassaya but the latter divorced her whereafter on 19.6.2003 he married her with Muhammad Bilal. She started living with him. On 7.7.2003 it is alleged that Zafar Iqbal (nephew of Petitioner No. 2) Manzoor Mai (sister of Petitioner No. 2) Ahmad Yar & Manzoor Ahmad (brothers of Petitioner No. 2) enticed Petitioner No. 1 away in sequal to illicit liaison between the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners in support of this petition has made…