Case Details

Citation(s)
1984 SLG 3760 = 1984 SLD 3760 = 1984 PLJ 300
Lahore High Court
Cr. Misc. No. 664-B/1984, decided on 15-4-1984.
Presented By: AKHTAR HASSAN, J
Malik A. R. Arshad, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Muhammad Afzai Wahlah, Advocate for
Respondents. Mr. Sabir Naseem, Advocate for State. Date of hearing : 15-4-1984.

MUHAMMD ABBAS—Petitioner

VERSUS

MUHAMMAD RIAZ and Another-Respondents

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 497

(i) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)— ------ Ss.  497  & 498—Bail—Application  for—Rule regarding—Held : Same court to deal with all subsequent   applications by same accus­ed or others involved in same case.   [P. 303]£ 1984 SCMR 134 ref. (ii) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)— ------ S. 497 (1) Proviso II—Bail—Grant of—Delay—Effect of—Held : Second proviso to S. 497 (1) haying taken care of delay, in trial, it becomes almost right to seek bail after  lapse of prescribed time— Held further : Delay of lesser duration, as corollary, not necessarily to justify bail.    [P. 303]C (iv) Zina °(7Vicfim "Examination of-Semen-Absence of-Effect ™n       : iT°fre     mg P.ossibility  of male  having  not   ejaculated semen at all dues to anxiety or nervousness at time of committing onence,   ol zina, absence of semen not to be decisive.    [P. 303]4  (v) Zina— of-Victim-Examination of~V1Ctim not shown to be h« i * SCX u intercourse earlier-Presence of blood on swabs, healed tears on hymen, its tightness as also tenderness to admit two Srtnf- *-Wi P?<!n Corroborating version of prosecutrix-Held : tact of victim s orjfice being too tender to be touched to suggest ORDER to be rather a vital circumstance justifying in  some measure  absence of injuries on her person, 5.    Nearly 4-5 times their  applications moved before Ch. Anwar AH, Additional Sessions Judge, Sheikhupura,  were turned down. Incidentally, he was away to Islamabad  on  Shariat Course   when in  his absence  last time, they moved an application  before Mian  Ghulam Ahmad,   Sessions Judge, Sheikhupura who in his order  dated   19-2-1984 allowed  them  bail primarily on the ground that the challan   had  not  yet been filed.    He was further influenced by the  fact that since …
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register