Case Details

Citation(s)
2026 SLG 4746 = 2026 SLD 4746 = 2026 PLJ 110
Lahore High Court
Crl. Misc. No. 1936-B of 2025
Presented By: Muhammad Amjad Rafiq JUDGE
Kh. Qaisar Butt, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Muhammad Adnan Latif, Deputy Prosecutor General for State. Syed Atif Moazam Bukhari, Advocate for Complainant. Date of hearing: 26.3.2025.

ZEESHAN alias SHANI--Petitioner

VERSUS

STATE etc.--Respondents

Law: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898

Section: 497

Law: Pakistan Penal Code (PPC),1860

Section: 324, 337-F(iii)/34

Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 497--Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324, 337-F(iii)/34--Differences in the medico-legal examination reports--Delay in recording the statement of the injured--Post arrest bail--Grant of--There is difference of observation in hand written medico-legal examination report of Zubair with one printed in computer copy--Injured made statement after about three months, he has simply said that fire hit on his hand without mentioning left or right side or hand delayed statement could not have been justified--He was medically examined after six days of the occurrence and was fully conscious after getting treatment--Repeater recovered on his lead has not support of PFSA report at this stage of proceedings---Petitioner is behind the bars, he is no more required for further investigation---Petitioner is admitted to bail.                                             [Para 5 & 6] A, B & C 2023 SCMR 734; 2023 SCMR 999; 2021 SCMR 63; 2023 SCMR 1140; 2023 SCMR 857 ref. Kh. Qaisar Butt, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Muhammad Adnan Latif, Deputy Prosecutor General for State. Syed Atif Moazam Bukhari, Advocate for Complainant. Date of hearing: 26.3.2025. Order Through this petition, petitioner seeks post arrest bail in case FIR No. 1404 dated 15.08.2024 under Sections 324/337-F(iii)/34, PPC registered at police station Alpa, Multan. 2.       Heard. Record perused. 3.       According to the prosecution case the petitioner and co-accused Pervaiz made firing with repeater which hit on different parts of body of Zubair injured. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that as per FIR the fire of present petitioner hit on the right hand and wrist as well as buttock of the injured, whereas, the fire made by Pervaiz hit left shin and left thigh of said injured, but in medico-legal examination report injury on the buttock was not observed by…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register