| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 4693 = 2026 SLD 4693 = 2026 PLJ 45 |
Lahore High Court
W.P. No. 62488 of 2017
Presented By: Muhammad Sajid Mehood Sethi JUDGE
Mr. Saif-ur-Rehman Jasra, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. Ameer Abbas Ali Khan, AAG with Asia Butt, Law Officer, Riaz Ahmad Cheema, DEO (EE-M), Khushab. Date of hearing: 14.1.2020.
W.P. No. 62488 of 2017
Presented By: Muhammad Sajid Mehood Sethi JUDGE
Mr. Saif-ur-Rehman Jasra, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. Ameer Abbas Ali Khan, AAG with Asia Butt, Law Officer, Riaz Ahmad Cheema, DEO (EE-M), Khushab. Date of hearing: 14.1.2020.
SADDAM HUSSAIN, etc.--Petitioners
VERSUS
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, etc.--Respondents
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 199--LL.B Degree--Equivalence with Master’s Degree--Grant of additional marks--Recruitment (elementary school educators)--Policy interpretation--No prohibition in advertisement/rules--recognition by higher education commission--Vested rights-similarly placed candidates--At the very outset, Law Officer was asked to show from advertisement as well as policy that LL.B degree is not equal to Masters degree--However, he could not substantiate that respondents were not entitled for award of additional marks of LL.B degree--We had noted that there was no prohibition in advertisement as well as in policy to award additional marks to LL.B degree holders for appointment against post in question and admittedly Higher Education Commission had recognized it equal to Mastersdegree on basis of years of education--We also agree with findings given by Single Judge that decisive steps have already been taken on both sides whereby vested rights have been created in favour of respondents for post in question--Petition allowed. [Para 5] A Mr. Saif-ur-Rehman Jasra, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. Ameer Abbas Ali Khan, AAG with Asia Butt, Law Officer, Riaz Ahmad Cheema, DEO (EE-M), Khushab. Date of hearing: 14.1.2020. Order C.M.No. 07-2017. This is an application for impleading applicant, namely Ali Zeeshan S/O Zulfiqar Ali, as petitioner in this writ petition. 2. With the concurrence of learned counsel for the parties, this C.M. is allowed and applicant namely Ali Zeeshan is impleaded as Petitioner No. 2 in this writ petition. The amended memo of parties, annexed with this application, be…