Case Details

Citation(s)
2001 SLG 3107 = 2001 SLD 3107 = 2001 CLC 280
Board of Revenue, Punjab
R.O.R. No.724 of 1999, decided on 1st August, 2000.
Presented By: Shahzad Hassan Pervez, Member (Judicial-1)
Ch. Abdul Saleem for Petitioners. Ch. Muhammad Zafar Iqbal for
Respondents.

ALLAH WASAYA and another---Petitioners

VERSUS

FALAK SHER and another---Respondents

Law: West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967

Section: 42, 164

West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967) Ss. 42 & 164---Gift---Validity of entry of gift in mutation ---Revision-- Donor/father of parties gifted his land to his three sons, excluding respondent the fourth one---Entry of mutation, though was made in mutation register, but could not be sanctioned due to non-payment of District Council fee---Contention was that all legal requirements of gift like offer, acceptance and delivery of possession in the context of gift were complete-- Respondent/left out son of donor had challenged gift in favour of donees alleging that report in Roznamcha Waqiati on basis of which mutation of gift was attested, could not be made basis of forged gift---Authority below was directed that disputed mutation of gift should be decided in open assembly after hearing respondent, but the Authority had not given opportunity of hearing to respondent at the time of attestation of mutation in question-- Validity---Mutation in dispute having been attested after death of donor, Revenue Officer should have made order under S.42(6) of West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 in presence of person/respondent whose right had been acquired---Since donor was no longer alive when mutation of gift was sanctioned the same was sanctioned in contravention of mandatory provisions of law---Whether donor and donee had accepted offer and delivery of possession took place before demise of donor, were matter which ought to have been taken to and adjudicated upon by Civil Court---Since respondent had right to inherit property left by his father, gift in favour of petitioner/donee was ordered to be struck down. PLD 1966 W.P. (Rev.) 78 and 1984 MLD 272 ref.                                                                                                                                               ORDER It is…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register