| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1964 SLG 3710 =1964 SLD 3710 = 1964 PLD 20 |
West Pakistan
Appeal No. 135 of 1962-63, decided on 20th May 1963, District Sargodha.
Presented By: Nasir Ahmad, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan
Inayat Ullah for Appellant. Iftkhar-ul-Haq and Feroze Din for Petitioner. Abdul Ghafoor for
Respondent.
Appeal No. 135 of 1962-63, decided on 20th May 1963, District Sargodha.
Presented By: Nasir Ahmad, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan
Inayat Ullah for Appellant. Iftkhar-ul-Haq and Feroze Din for Petitioner. Abdul Ghafoor for
Respondent.
FATEH KHAN-Appellant
VERSUS
MUHAMMAD IQBAL-Respondent
Law:
Section:
Lambardar------ ----Candidate being in service ignored by Collector-Appointment of other candidate made-Unsuccessful candidate resigning from service subsequently--Cannot be appointed in appeal. P L D 1963 W. P. (Rev.) 3 fol. ORDER This case relates to the appointment of a temporary Lambar dar of Chak No. 32/MB, Thal Colony, District Sargodha. The previous Lambardar who was brother of Fateh Khan appellant had been dismissed for having been involved in a murder case. The respondent Muhammad Iqbal who was employed as a teacher in another village was ignored by the Col lector on the ground of his being an absentee. The Collec tor's choice fell upon Fateh Khan but the learned Com missioner interfered in appeal and appointed Muhammad Iqbal instead as it was stated that by that time he had resigned from his teaching job and had taken up residence in the estate. A second appeal has now been filed by Fateh Khan and a revision by Muhammad Bakhsh, who was also a claiment before the Collector and whose appeal had been dismissed by the learned Commissioner. https://www.pakistanlawsite.com/Login/PrintCaseLaw?caseName=1964BR-WP14 1/3 P L D 1964 W Two main points have been taken up before me. The first is that at the time of the appointment of Fateh Khan as Lambardar by the Collector Muhammad Iqbal was not residing in the estate. According to Muhammad Iqbal's own case he was then employed as a…