Case Details

Citation(s)
2001 SLG 3033 = 2001 SLD 3033 = 2001 CLC 130
Board of Revenue, Punjab
R.O.R..No.2203 of 1991, decided on 19th September, 2000.
Presented By: Shahzad Hassan Pervez, Member (Judicial-I)
Muhammad Nawaz Kasuri for Petitioner. Sardar Shaukat Ali for
Respondent No. 1.

SARDAR ALI ---Petitioner

VERSUS

SAJID NAZIR and 2 others---Respondents

Law: West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967

Section: 163(2)(d)

West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967) S. 163---Review---Scope---Commissioner, Collector and Assistant Collector had been empowered under S.163 of West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 to review any order passed against any aggrieved person on an application made within stipulated period subject to proviso to S.163(2)(d), West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 to the effect that an order against which an appeal or revision had been preferred, would not be reviewed. PLD 1985 Rev. 237 ref.                                                                                                                                                             ORDER Nazir Ahmad son of Muhammad Ismail, caste Arain, was owner of 45 Kanals, 16 Marlas in Khata No.58/156 of Village Ghanieke, Tehsil and District Kasur. Relating to Khata No.56 measuring 70 Kanals, 11 Marlas, Nazir Ahmad son of Muhammad Ismail, caste Arain was shown as owner in the Jamabandi for the year 1983-84. Nazir Ahmad sold his entire land in Khata No.58/156 to Sardar Ali son of Khair Din, caste Arain through registered sale-deed. Mutation No.607 pertaining to this transaction was sanctioned on 9th April, 1987. At the time of registration of sale-deed, Patwari had endorsed on the Fard Malkiat that the total holding of Nazir Ahmad in the village was 45 Kanals, 16 Marlas. In his report submitted to D.C./Collector by Naib-Tehsildar in connection with processing of application submitted by Sajid Nazir for review of Mutation No.607, it was stated that because of the variation in names i.e., Nazir Ahmad and Muhammad Nazir in the two respective Khatas i.e., 58/156 and 56, the Patwari fell in error in holding that the total ownership of Nazir Ahmad was 45 Kanals, 16 Marlas reckoning Muhammad Nazir to be another landowner whereas it was…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register