Case Details

Citation(s)
1966 SLG 4515 = 1966 SLD 4515 = 1966 PLD 172
West Pakistan
Appeal No. 22 of 1964-65, decided on 12th January 1966.  
Presented By: I. U. Khan, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan  
  Sh. Riaz Ahmad for Petitioner. Ch. A. Waheed Saleem for
Respondent.  

SAEED AHMAD-Petitioner  

VERSUS

  BARKAT ALI-Respondent  

Law:

Section:

  Lambardar-Appointment-Two permanent Lambardars appointed on probation of one year-Appointments considered to have been finally made-Order cannot be reopened merely on ground that certain considerations were not taken into account.   Practice- Miscellaneous petition against Lambardar dismissed by Collector-No appeal or revision competent against order of Collector.   ORDER   This order will dispose of the following two cases:-----   Saeed Ahmad v: Barkat Ali (Appeal No. 22 of 1964-65). Barkat All v. Saeed Ahmad and Din Muhammad (Revision No. 387 of 1964-65).   The above two cases have been filed against orders dated the 3rd of October 1964, passed by the Commissioner, Bahawalpur Division, whereby he partially accepted the appeal preferred by Barkat Ali and remanded the case.   The facts of the case are that, on the 28th of September 1959, the Collector appointed Saeed Ahmad and Din Muhammad as permanent Lambardars on probation of one year. No appeal or revision was filed against these appointment orders nor were any orders passed after the expiry of one year.   Subsequently, Saeed Ahmad applied for the creation of two paths in the village. This request was granted. One pant was assigned to Saeed Ahmad and the other to Din Muhammad Lambardar.   On 7-2-1964, Barkat Ali petitioner applied for the creation of a third post of Lambardar. No orders have been passed on this application so far.   On the 27th of March 1964, Saeed Ahmad applied for his appointment on a permanent basis. On the 7th of April 1964, Barkat Ali put in an application making serious allegations against Saeed Ahmad. Necessary enquiries were made and the allegations were found baseless. On the 25th of May 1964, the Collector passed orders appointing Saeed Ahmad and Din Muhammad Lambardars on a permanent basis.   Barkat Ali went in appeal to the Commissioner against the appointment of Saeed Ahmed and Din Muhammad. The appeal was partly accepted and the case was remanded. Barkat Ali has come up in revision and Saeed Ahmad has preferred an appeal.   I have heard the learned counsel for the parties. There has been some confusion on account of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register