| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 4507 = 2026 SLD 4507 = 2026 PLJ 663 |
Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan
W.P. No. 7652 of 2026
Presented By: Muzamil Akhtar Shabir JUDGE
Syed Tajamm-ul-Hussain Bukhari, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Umair Ahmad,
Respondent No. 5 in person. Messrs Musleh-ud-Din Khan and Malik Muhammad Bakhsh Khakhi, A.A.Gs, Syed Ali Allow-u-Din and Ahmad Hassan Khan Khichi Advocates. Rana Ghulam Hussain, Assistant Attorney General for Pakistan, Dr. Muhammad Azeem Raja Advocate. Date of hearing: 22.06.2026.
W.P. No. 7652 of 2026
Presented By: Muzamil Akhtar Shabir JUDGE
Syed Tajamm-ul-Hussain Bukhari, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Umair Ahmad,
Respondent No. 5 in person. Messrs Musleh-ud-Din Khan and Malik Muhammad Bakhsh Khakhi, A.A.Gs, Syed Ali Allow-u-Din and Ahmad Hassan Khan Khichi Advocates. Rana Ghulam Hussain, Assistant Attorney General for Pakistan, Dr. Muhammad Azeem Raja Advocate. Date of hearing: 22.06.2026.
KHIZAR HAYAT--Petitioner
VERSUS
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, etc.--Respondents
Law: Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009
Section: 31
Punjab Rent Premises Act, 2009 (VII of 2009)-- ----S. 31--Civil Judge/Rent Controller--Execution of Ejectment order--Verbal assertion--Initially tenancy of premises with construction thereon was created between parties at monthly rent--Petitioner was running an educational institution at said premises--More than 2000 students were getting education in premises and he had to make alternate arrangements for shifting premises and his installation, articles and belongings available at spot may be damaged if forcible eviction took place, therefore, a period of two months expiring on 31.08.2026 was provided to him to vacate premises subject to payment of outstanding rent/dues within time to respondents, failing which to order providing for afore-mentioned extension period shall cease to have its effect--Petition was disposed of accordingly. [P. 668] B PLD 2001 Karachi 124; 2020 CLC 884; 1993 SCMR 374; 2011 MLD 1956; 2024 YLR 776; 2021 CLC 1405; 2024 YLR 1981; PLD 2019 Lahore 363; 2016 MLD 1095; 2015 CLC 1187; 2011 YLR 2205; 2004 CLC 289 ref. Oral Statement-- ----Oral statement of a party to an instrument which varied or tended to vary terms of a written document/agreement could not be admitted into evidence. [P. 665] A 2014 SCMR 1217 ref. Syed Tajamm-ul-Hussain Bukhari, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Umair Ahmad, Respondent No. 5 in person. Messrs Musleh-ud-Din Khan and Malik Muhammad Bakhsh Khakhi, A.A.Gs, Syed Ali Allow-u-Din and Ahmad Hassan Khan Khichi Advocates. Rana Ghulam Hussain, Assistant Attorney General for Pakistan, Dr. Muhammad Azeem Raja Advocate. Date of hearing: 22.06.2026. Order The petitioner, Khizar Hayat, through this constitutional petition has called in question order dated 10.06.2026 passed by the learned Civil Judge/Rent Controller Multan/Respondent No. 2, whereby objection petition filed by the petitioner against execution of ejectment order passed against the petitioner and in favour of private Respondent Nos. 3…