Case Details

Citation(s)
1976 SLG 3043 = 1976 SLD 3043 = 1976 PLD 1
Peshawar High Court
Writ Petition No. 554 of 1975, heard on 24th October 1975.
Presented By: Ghulam Safdar Shah, C. J. and Abdul Ghani Khan Khattak, J
Abdul Majid v. Settlement Commissioner, Peshawar and D. I. Khan Divisions and others ref. Mohammad Afzal Bangash for Petitioner. S. Abai Ali, A. A:-G. with S. Sibtul Hassan for
Respondents Nos. 1 to 3. M. Mohammad Aman Khan for
Respondent No. 4. M. Sardar Khan for
Respondent No. 5. Pir Masoom Shah for
Respondent No. 6.

BASHIR AHMAD BILOUR-Petitioner

VERSUS

MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, PESHAWAR THROUGH ITS ADMINISTRATOR AND 3 OTHERS-Respondents

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199, r.225(4)

Law: N.W. F. P. Local Government Ordinance (III of 1972)

Section: 62, 63

Law: West Pakistan Municipal Committee Octroi Rules, 1964

Section: r.225

(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Art. 199-Writ-Locus standi of petitioner-Controlling Authority passing order in violation or disregard of r. 225(4), West Pakistan Municipal Committees Octroi Rules, 1964 -Person prejudicial by such order-Held, an "aggrieved person" within meaning of Art. 199 ---West Pakistan Municipal Committees Octroi Rules, 1964, r. 225 (4). ---[Writ-Words and phrases]. Mian Fazal Din v. Lahore Improvement Trust, Lahore and another P L D 1969 S C 223 and Ikram Bus Service v. Board of Revenue P L D 1963 S C 564 ref. (b) Interpretation of statutes Each word of statutory instrument to be given a meaning unless it would lead to absurdity or cause manifest injustice. (c) N: W.F.P. People's Local Government Ordinance (III of 1972)  Ss. 62 & 63 and West Pakistan Municipal Committees Octroi Rules 1964, r. 225---Administrator, Municipal Committee holding public auction for leasing out right to collect octroi, accepting highest bid and submitting same to Controlling Authority for confirmation--- Controlling Authority, on direction of Provincial Minister, without applying his own mind to case, rejecting highest bid of a person on his back and leasing out right to another person by private negotiations-- Action of Controlling Authority not only repugnant to provisions of law, but manifestly unjust and designed to undermine public confi dence-Such order, held, without jurisdiction and also opposed to principles of audi alteram partem (no one should be condemned unheard).-[Maxim]. Pate of hearing: 24th October 1975.                                                                                                                                   JUDGMENT GHULAM SAFDAR SHAH, C. J.-This petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan is meant to call in question the two orders of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register