Law:

Section: 13(3),1(a),13(ii),15(4)

(a) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)------   ----Ss. 13(3)(a)(ii) & 15 (4)-Questions of "good faith" and `existence or non-existence of any other property in occupation of landlord in same urban area suitable for his needs'-Questions of fact-Tribunals below arriving at concurrent finding on such ques tions after taking into consideration all evidence-High Court in second appeal under S. 15(4) not justified in upsetting finding how ever erroneous same may be.   Rechldas Sumomal v. Uttamchand Sakhuatrai and others A I R 1946 Sind 14; Assam Bengal Railway Co., Ltd., Chittagong v. Atul Chandra Sen A I R 1937 Cal. 314; Atma Singh v. Dr. Gian Das and others A I R 1941 Lah. 271; Firm Ganga Ram Kishan Das v. Firm Hari Ram Ram Lal and another A I R 1927 Lah. 909; Thakur and others v. Jawala and others A I R 1921 Lah. 291; Ibrahim v. Firm of Ghulam Husain and others A I R 1921 Sind 13; Abdul Samad v: Municipal Committee Delhi 75 P R 1916; Kala Singh v. Gahna Singh and another A I R 1932 Lah. 531 and Abdul Majid v. Khalil Ahmad P L D 1955 F C 38 ref:   (b)       West    Pakistan         Urban             Rent    Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)------   ---S. 15(4)-Second appeal to High Court under section Subject to terms of Ss. .100 & 101, C. P. C.-Concurrent finding of fact by Tribunals below erroneous-Interference by High Court not justified, however gross, and inexcusable error may be Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss. 100 & 101.   Pathana v. Mst. Wasai and another P L D 1965 S C 134 and Sh. Muhammad-Ikhlas and others v. Muhammad Ismail and others P L D 1963 S C 466 ref.   (c) West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)------   ----S. 13(3)(ii) - Ejectment from non-residential building --Landlord besides establishing his requirement in good faith must prove that he does not occupy any other property in same urban area suitable for his needs at relevant time.   Date of hearing: 12th April 1966.    JUDGMENT  …