| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1966 SLG 5330 = 1966 SLD 5330 = 1966 PLD 684 |
West Pakistan Lahore
Writ Petition No. 1670 of 1965, decided on 25th April 1966.
Presented By: Muhammad Gul and Muhammad Afzal Cheema, JJ
M. Saleem Chaudhry for Petitioner. Khalil-ur-Rehman for
Respondent No. 1. Nemo for
Respondents Nos. 2 and 3.
Writ Petition No. 1670 of 1965, decided on 25th April 1966.
Presented By: Muhammad Gul and Muhammad Afzal Cheema, JJ
M. Saleem Chaudhry for Petitioner. Khalil-ur-Rehman for
Respondent No. 1. Nemo for
Respondents Nos. 2 and 3.
WAHID BUS AND MAILSI TRANSPORT Co. LTD. Petitioner
VERSUS
AFZAL TRANSPORT Co., LTD., MULTAN AND OTHERS-Respondents
Law: West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Ordinance, (XIX of 1965)
Section: 122(2),46(8),69,64
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1962
Section: 98(2),98(a)
Law: Constitution of Pakistan (1956)
Section: 170
(a) West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Ordinance (XIX of 1965)------ -----S. 122 (2)-Validation and enforcibility of acts done and action taken under repealed enactments-Action taken and acts done should not be inconsistent with provisions of Ordinance. (b) West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Ordinance (XIX of 1965) and Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939)----- ---- Comparative analysis of two statutes. (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1962)------- -----Art. 98(2)(a)-"Aggrieved party"-Petitioners, operators on major part of route in respect of which temporary route permits issued to other persons under S. 64, West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Ordinance (XIX of 1965)-Have locus standi to invoke writ jurisdiction-West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Ordinance (XIX of 1965), S. 64. Tariq Transport Co. Lahore v. Sargodha-Bhera Bus Service P L D 1958 S C 437 and Giant Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. Mograth 341 U S 123, 151 considered. (d) West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Ordinance (XIX of 1965)------ -----Ss. 46 (8), 69 & 122(2) and Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939), Ss. 44(5) & 68 read with Punjab Motor Vehicles Rule., 1940, r.4(a)(l)-No Rules framed under S.46(8) of, Ordinance-Rules framed under repealed Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 continue in force if not inconsistent with provisions of Ordinance-Powers conferred on Chairman, Regional Transport Authority by rule 4(a)(1) of Punjab Motor Vehicles Rules, 1940-Continue to be applicable and include category of cases falling under new clause (d) of S. 64 of Ordinance. (e) Interpretation of statutes------ ----Consistency between earlier and subsequent provision should be presumed unless contrary intention expressed. (f) West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Ordinance (XIX of 1965)------ -----S. 64(2)-Delegation of powers-Purpose-To provide expeditious remedy for disposal of cases of urgent nature. (g) Constitution of Pakistan (1962)------- -----Art. 98 and Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Art. 170--Scope of writ jurisdiction under …