| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1963 SLG 3623 = 1963 SLD 3623 = 1963 PTD 713 |
Dacca High Court
Income-tax Application No. 1 of 1961, decided on 31st May 1962.
Presented By: I. H. Chowdhury, C. J. and A. S. Chowdury, J
S. M. Abbas for Petitioner. A. F. M. Mesbahuddin and A. M. Khan Chowdhury for
Respondent.
Income-tax Application No. 1 of 1961, decided on 31st May 1962.
Presented By: I. H. Chowdhury, C. J. and A. S. Chowdury, J
S. M. Abbas for Petitioner. A. F. M. Mesbahuddin and A. M. Khan Chowdhury for
Respondent.
A. HUSSAIN S. MIRZA & Co., DACCA
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA
Law:
Section:
Income-tax Act (XI of 1922), S. 66(2)-Reference-Loss to assessee due to shortage of stocks in transit- Whether assessee entitled to deduction-Question of law. JUDGMENT CHOWDHURY, C. J.-This Rule is to show cause why the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Dacca Bench, Dacca, should not be directed to state a case and refer to this Court for its opinion the following point, namely :--- "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in not allowing the loss of Rs. 60,697 in the assessment for the year in which it occurred." Facts of the case, shortly stated, are as follows; The assessee, petitioner is a Company and it deals in electrical goods and also in M. S. rods. The petitioner purchased several bundles of M . S. rods from Pakistan Industries Limited of Karachi on an invoice mentioning the particulars of the rods, i.e., the number of the bundles and weight of the rods sold. The goods were shipped from Karachi to Chittagong by the vessel of East and West Shipping Company of which Messrs James Finlay & Co., was the agent. When the goods arrived at Chittagong there was a shortage of 333 bundles of rods and a short certificate was granted by the Port Authorities at Chittagong and when the goods were transhipped by rail from Chittagong to Dacca, there was a further shortage of 31 bundles, the total weight of shortage being 74 tons and the total loss suffered being Rs. 60,697. These facts are not disputed by the Income-tax Authority. But the books of accounts maintained by the assessee in mercantile system shows the purchase of the total quantity of rods and a turn-over of Rs. 1,54,415. Due to the non-receipt of the entire purchased stock, the closing stock was shown at Rs. 56,155 with the resultant loss of Rs. 41,842 but the ultimate loss amounted to Rs. 60,697 due to the loss in transit from Karachi to Dacca. The only question that arose between the Income-tax Authority or before the Appellate Tribunal is whether the assessee is entitled to get deduction of Rs. 60,697 in the assessment for the year in which it occurred. The right to get deduction is not disputed by the Income-tax…