| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1981 SLG 3226 = 1981 SLD 3226 = 1981 SCMR 744 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 11 of 1979, decided on 2nd March, 1980. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, a Lahore, dated 24th October, 1979 in F. A. O. No. 217 of 1978).
Presented By: Anwarul Haq, C. J. and Muhammad AJzal Zullah, J
Munir A. Sheikh, Advocate instructed by Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate on-Record for Petitioner. Nerno for
Respondent.
Civil Petition No. 11 of 1979, decided on 2nd March, 1980. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, a Lahore, dated 24th October, 1979 in F. A. O. No. 217 of 1978).
Presented By: Anwarul Haq, C. J. and Muhammad AJzal Zullah, J
Munir A. Sheikh, Advocate instructed by Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate on-Record for Petitioner. Nerno for
Respondent.
Mst. RASHIDA BIBI-Petitioner
VERSUS
MUHAMMAD ISMAIL-Respondent
Law: Guardian and Wards Act (VIII of 1890)
Section: 25
(a) Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890) S. 25-Custody of minor-Male child over 7 years in age-Custody of such child to be determined on basis of welfare of minor notwithstanding presumption under Muslim Law as to custody in such case lying with father-Question of custody decided not merely on basis of Muslim Law and rules but in light of all attending circumstances of case-Concurrent orders of Guardian Judge and High Court handing over minor's custody to father maintained. [Custody of minor]. (b) Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890) S. 25 -Custody of minor-Failure of father to pay maintenance regularly, held, would not automatically disentitle him to custody of his son, irrespective of other circumstances of case.-[Custody of minor]. Date of hearing : 2nd March, 1980 . ORDER ANWARUL HAQ, C. J.-The petitioner Rashida Bibi is aggrieved by an order made by a learned Judge of the Lahore High Court on the 24th of October, 1979, by which he has upheld, with a modification, an order of the Guardian Judge, Faisalabad, dated the 22nd of April, 1976, granting the custody of the minor son of the parties to the father. 2. The petitioner was married to the respondent about 10 years ago and from the wedlock two children were born, namely, a daughter. and the minor…