Case Details

Citation(s)
1981 SLG 3155 = 1981 SLD 3155 = 1981 SCMR 429
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 582 of 1978, decided on 21st March, 1981. (On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court dated 21-8-1978 in W. P. No. 4100/78).
Presented By: Anwarul Haq, C. J. and Shafi-ur-Rehman, JJ
Ch. Altaf Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Salahud Dirt, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Ch. Sana Ullah Bajwa for
Respondent No. 3.

THE VICE-PRESIDENT-Petitioner

VERSUS

CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS-Respondents

Law: Industrial Relations Ordinance, (XXIII of 1969)

Section: 25-A

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199, 185(3)

(a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) S. 25-A and Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199-Re-instate ment-Writ proceedings-Employee dismissed from service for miscon duct but re-instated on appeal-High Court on writ petition being filed dismissing same on ground of counsel having conceded matter being fought only as an academic matter for future guidance inasmuch as respondent had already resumed duty and that question of past benefits being only a consequential matter to be agitated before appropriate forum could not be proper subject-matter of writ petition-Held, re-instatement of petitioner to circumstances neither rendered proceedings in High Court infructuous nor made it only academic-- Re-instate ment having been made pursuant to order of Labour Appellate Tribunal having to be complied with, compliance made under protest acid subject to result of litigation and not conclusive -of matter. [Industrial dispute]. (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973 ) Art. 185(3)-Leave to appeal-Objection not raised before lower Courts and consequently not dealt with by any of Courts, held, not entertain able for first time in leave to appeal proceedings. (c) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) S. 25-A-Judge in his own cause-Officer initiating proceedings handing over tainted money for laying trap against employee and also supervising trap at concluding stages and witnessing a part of transaction-Involvement of such officer in proceedings, held, more than that of a witness and made him a Judge in his own cause.---[Industrial dispute]. Date of hearing : 21st March, 1981.                                                                                                                                                                        …
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register