| Citation(s) |
| 1966 SLG 5199 = 1966 SLD 5199 = 1966 PLD 331 |
Dacca High Court
Petitions Nos. 507 to 510, 438, 447, 458, 459, 463, 480, 493, 496 and 503 of 1965, decided on 11th January 1966.
Presented By: Murshed, C. J., Abdus Sattar, Idris, Salahuddin Ahmed and Abu Md. Abdulla, JJ
SHERAJUL HAQUE PATWARI-Petitioner
VERSUS
SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHANDPUR AND OTHERS-Respondents| SEKANDAR ALI TAPADAR-Petitioner versus SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHANDPUR AND OTHERSRespondents Petition No. 509 of 1965 ABDUL LATIF KHAN-Petitioner versus PAKISTAN, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law AND OTHERS-Respondents| ABUL BASHAR CHOWDHURY-Petitioner versus THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHANDPUR AND OTHERS-Respondents| SYEDUR RAHMAN CHOWDHURY-Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS-Respondents| HARI BILASH SHAHA-Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS-Respondents| HABIBULLA CHOUKDAR--Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS-Respondents| MD. ABDUR RAHIM SAWDAGAR-Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS?--Respondents| MD. HANIF-Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS?--Respondents| ABDUL JALIL TALUKDAR-Petitioner versus BASIC DEMOCRACY AND LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT AND OTHERS-Respondents| FAZLUL HAQUE-Petitioner versus SYUDUZZAMAN BHUIYAN-Respondent| AHMAD HUSSAIN-Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERSRespondents| AND K. M. AHMADULLAH CHOWDHURY-Petitioner versus NADER ALI KHAN-Respondent
Law: Electoral College Act (IV of 1964)
Section: 57,158(4)
Law: Basic Democracies Order [President's Order No. 18 of 1959
Section: 3(1),3(50),3(51),3(52),3(53),3(54)
From Judgment of Murshed, C. J:-[Summary of findings of law appears on) ...p. 381]MM (a) Electoral College Act (IV of 1964), S. 57 read with Art. 158(4), Constitution of Pakistan (1962) and Basic Democracies Order (18 of 1959), Art. 3(1), sub-clauses (50), (51), (52), (53) and (54) as amended by Basic Democracies (Amendment) Act (XVI of 1965), S. 2(e)-Section 57, Electoral College Act, 1964, ultra vires the Constitution-Actions dependent on S. 57 held to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect within meaning of Art. 98(2)(a)(ii) of Constitution - Section 57 stands isolated in scheme of Electoral College Act, 1964-Performance of functions of Local Government not incidental to discharging duties of elec?tion-Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Third Schedule, items 35 & 49-Section 57 is tantamount to abdication of legislative power and delegates legislative function without enunciating guiding policies-Legislation exclusive field of Legislature-Basic Demo?cracies (Amendment) Act, 1965, fails to confer powers of Local Government on bodies created by S. 57, Electoral College Act, 1964-Interpretation of statutes-Text of Order as amended not spelling out any conferment of powers of Local Government-Mere declaration in preamble as to such object of Act cannot confer such powers (by majority: per Murshed, C. J., Idris, Salahuddin Ahmed, Abdulla, JJ. agreeing; Sattar, J. contra). Held, that section 57, Electoral College Act (IV of 1964) was ultra vires of the Constitution; that all acts done in pursuance of, and all acts dependent on section 57 were without lawful authority and of no legal effect. Even on a consideration of section 57 in the context of the Basic Democracies (Amendment) Act (XVI of 1965) and, on the thesis that the said Act has, in fact, conferred powers of Local Government on bodies constituted under section 57, petitions under Article 98(2)(a)(ii) of the Con?stitution were entitled to succeed and rules must be made absolute on this ground alone. Section 57 stands isolated in the scheme of the Electoral College Act, 1964 as solitary section which is obviously and patently another kind of legislation under Article 158(4)…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register