| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1966 SLG 5140 = 1966 SLD 5140 = 1966 PLD 211 |
Lahore High Court
Execution Second Appeal No. 217 of 1962, decided on 10th February 1964.
Presented By: Muhammad Akram, J
Raja Said Akbar Khan for Appellant. Malik Muhammad Nadir on behalf of Sh. Muhammad Bashir for
Respondent.
Execution Second Appeal No. 217 of 1962, decided on 10th February 1964.
Presented By: Muhammad Akram, J
Raja Said Akbar Khan for Appellant. Malik Muhammad Nadir on behalf of Sh. Muhammad Bashir for
Respondent.
ASGHAR HAMID---Appellant
VERSUS
Mst. NASEEM AKHTAR---Respondent
Law: West Pakistan Relief of Indebtedness Ordinance (XV of1960)
Section: 2(c),7
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 60,60(1),60(b),60(c)
Law: Punjab Alienation of Land Act (XIII of 1900)
Section: 2(3),16
West Pakistan Relief of Indebtedness Ordinance (XV of1960), Ss. 2(c) & 7-No evidence to prove that judgment-debtor, earned livelihood "mainly by agriculture"-Mere fact of being landowner in estate-Not sufficient to hold him to be a "debtor" House belonging to such judgment-debtor not exempt from attach ment and sale under S. 7-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 60. Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 60 (1), (b), (c) -"Agriculturist"-Term used in restricted sense and carries same meaning in both clauses (b) & (c)-Does not include person said to be agriculturist merely by reason of caste-Person to fall within meaning of term to be agriculturist by profession and solely dependent on agriculture for his livelihood. Sant Ram v. Buta Khan A I R 1938 Lah. 72; Balwant Singh v. Anjaman Imdad Bahami Qarza and another A I R 1939 Lah. 40; Nihal Singh v. Sir! Ram and others A I R 1939 Lah. 388 and Shrimant Appasabeb Tuliaram Desai and others v. Bhalchandra Yithalrao Thube A I R 1961 S C 589 ref. Punjab Alienation of Land Act (X111 of 1900), Ss. 2(3) & 16-'Land" not shown to have been "let or occupied for agri cultural purpose or purposes subservient to agriculture" Protec tion of S. 16 not available against sale of such land-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 60. Date of hearing: 24th January 1964. JUDGMENT This is an Execution Second Appeal by Asghar $amid, judgment-debtor. Mst. Naseem Akhtar got a simple decree for the recovery of Rs. 10,733-8-0 against Asghar Hamid and during the course of its execution certain houses and landed property belonging to the judgment-debtor were attached. Thereafter, on the 9th of June 1960, the judgment-debtor filed his objections under section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the attachment of House No. M-46, Murree Road, Rawalpindi, and the land.. In his application the judgment-debtor alleged that he is agriculturist by profession and a Zamindar and is dependent on agriculture for his livelihood. As regards House No. M-46 situated on Murree Road, Rawalpindi, the case of the appellant is that it is his residential…