Law:

Section:

  Revision-Concurrent findings of fact by Collector and Commissioner-Revision filed after 90 days-Petition dismissed.   Lambardar-Appointment-Mere fact that candidate worked for some years as temporary Lambardar does not mean that he has acquired any right to such appointment.   ORDER   This order will dispose of the following two Revisions:-   Abdur Rehman v. Allah Rakha (Revision No. 1800 of 1963-64). Barkat Ali v. Abdur Rehman (Revision No. 357 of 1964-65).   The two revisions have been filed against orders dated the 18th of February 1964, and the thirteenth of October 1964, passed by Commissioner, Multan, whereby the appeals preferred by the petitioners were rejected.   The first revision relates to appointment of Lambardar in patti Harbans Singh, while the second is about the appointment of Lambardar in patti Birj Lal.   The facts of the first revision are that when the question of appointment of a permanent Lambardar of this patti came up for consideration, five persons applied for the post. The Collector appointed Allah Rakha. Abdur Rehman went in appeal to the Commissioner, but it was rejected. Hence this revision.   As regards the second revision the, vacancy arose on the migration of the non-Muslim Lambardar, and for the appointment of a permanent Lambardar, 13 candidates came forward. The Collector ultimately appointed Abdur Rehman…