Law:

Section:

Ejectment-Landlord and tenant-Notice of ejectment- Determination of validity or otherwise of notice to be made after perusal of revenue record-Relationship of landlord and tenant established-Tenant failing to prove that batai had been paid -Notice cannot be held to be invalid.   ORDER   This is a second revision filed against on order dated the 18th of July 1963, passed by Additional Commissioner, Lahore, (while exercising the powers of the Commissioner) whereby he rejected the revision preferred by the petitioners.   The facts of the case are that the respondent filed an appli cation for ejectment of the petitioners before the Assistant Collector, IInd Grade, on the ground that they had defaulted in payment of rent for the year 1962. The petitioners, on the other hand, contended that the respondent bad limited interest and they had become owners after the death of their uncle. The Assistant Collector, however, held that the respondent was in hissadari possession of the land in dispute and the petitioners were her tenants. They were, therefore, ordered to be ejected. The petitioners, went in appeal to the Collector but it was dismissed. They then filed a revision before the Commissioner which was also rejected by the Additional Commissioner. Hence this second revision.   I have heard the learned counsel for…