Case Details

Citation(s)
1963 SLG 3488 = 1963 SLD 3488 = 1963 PLD 883
Sindh High Court
Civil Revision Application No. 286 of 1961, decided on 25th April 1963.  
Presented By: Qadeeruddin Ahmad, J
Ahmad Saeed for Applicant.   S. M. Raza for
Respondent.   Date of hearing : 17th April 1963.  

SIRAJUDDIN-Applicant  

VERSUS

  MUHAMMAD SHARIF-Opponent

Law:

Section:

  Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VII, r. 11 & S. 2(2)-- Rejection of plaint under O. VII, r. 2-Decree within meaning of S.2(2).   Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 151 - Remedy available under specific provisions of Code - Inherent powers under section cannot be invoked.   Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 149-Words "at any stage" -Mean "at any stage" of proceedings and not "at any time" - Termination of proceedings with passing of decree ---Provisions not applicable-Plaint rejected under O. VII, r. 11, C. P. C.-Extension of time under S. 149 to make up deficiency of Court fee cannot be made.   Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. IX, rr. 4, 2 & 3 and O. VII, rr. 11 & 13-Provisions of r. 4, O. IX, applicable only to suits dismissed under rr. 2 & 3 of O. IX-Plaint rejected under O. VII, r. 2-Remedy lies under O. VII, r. 13.   Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VII, rr. 11 & 13 and S. 151 - Plaint rejected under O. VII, r. 11 - Suit becoming time-barred-Rejected plaint cannot be restored by invoking inherent powers under S. 151.   Jurisdiction-Absence of jurisdiction and erroneous decision in exercise of jurisdiction-Distinguished.   Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. IX, r. 4-Court restoring suit dismissed for default after claim of plaintiff becomes time-barred-Order of restoration may be wrong for insufficiency of ground for restoration but is not illegal or without jurisdiction(Obiter).   Ram Dayal v. Sher Singh I L R 1923 All. 518 ; S. M.   Bose v. Hafiz Muhammad Fateh Nasib A I R 1934 Cal. 623 ; Saratchandra v. Mrityunjay A I R 1935 Cal. 336-2 ; Atul Krishna v. Browrilal A I R 1952 Assam 149 ; Md. Yunus v. Sugra Begum A I R 1955 Hyd. 156 ; Kishorelal v. Surajmal A I R 1956 Raj. 164 ; Hubraj Singh v. Ram Dasi A I R 1954 All. 719 ; Messrs Ghulam Farid-Muhammad Latif v. Central Bank of India Limited, Lahore P L D 1954 Lah. 575 and Amir Hassan Khan v. Sheo Bakhsh Singh I L R 11 Cal. 6 ref. JUDGMENT   In this application the request of the applicant is that the pf4ers of Mr. Ali Muhammad V. Akhound, Sub-Judge, First Class of Karachi, dated the 19th…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register