Law:

Section:

Injunction-Status quo in respect of property means status quo about possession-Status quo also means that tenants should remain in possession.   ORDER This order will dispose of the following two revisions:----   Syed Haider Raza v. Syed Imam Ali Shah (No. 1521). Syed Imam Ali Shah v. Syed Haider Raza (No. 1595).   These counter revisions have been filed against orders dated the 6th of March 1963, passed by the Additional Commissioner, Lahore, whereby he rejected the counter appeals of the parties:   The facts of the case are that the land in dispute is situated in villages Kalianwala and Kot Qadir Bux. On the 1st of June 1962, the Supreme Court directed that "during the pendency of the appeal, the present status quo will be maintained and the party in actual possession will not be disturbed".   When these orders reached the Tehsildar, he found that none of the parties were in actual cultivating possession of the land in dispute in either of the two villages. In the case of village Kalianwala, there was a Supurdar, but in the case of Kot Qadir Bux, even a Supurdar had not been appointed. The Tahsildar, however, gave a decision in favour of Haider Raza petitioner. Imam Ali Shah went in appeal to the Collector who directed that, so far as village Kalianwala was concerned, the Supurdar should continue but, in respect of the land in Kot Qadir Bux, the tenants should continue to be in possession provided they furnish a security. Both the parties went in appeal to the Additional Commissioner, but their appeals were rejected. Hence these counter revisions.   I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the record. As regards village Kalianwala, the…