Law:

Section:

  Lambardar - Appointment - Candidate belonging to majority community, one of the considerations for appointment.   Revision - Additional evidence - Not to be allowed.   Practice-Concurrent finding of fact by Collector and Commissioner-Not interfered with.     ORDER   The respondent is not present, but, in the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to insist upon his appearance.   This is a revision filed against an order, dated the 16th of June 1965, passed by Commissioner, Multan Division, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed.   The facts of the case are that, when the case for appointing a temporary Lambardar came up for consideration, seven candidates applied. Ultimately the Collector selected the respondent. The petitioner went in appeal to the Commissioner, but it was rejected. Hence this revision.   I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The only point in favour of the petitioner is that he belongs to the majority community, but this is one of the considerations which has…