Law:

Section:

Lambardar-Appointment-Vacancy caused on dismissal of Lambardar-Hereditary claim of candidate one of the factors to be taken into consideration.   Lambardar-Appointment-Vacancy caused on dismissal of Lambardar-Fact that candidate worked as temporary Lambardar does not constitute any right.   Lambardar-Appointment-Community and not caste or sub-caste to be taken into consideration.   Practice-Concurrent finding of fact by Collector and Commissioner, neither perverse nor unreasonable-Not interfered with.   ORDER   This is a revision filed against an order, dated the 11th of August 1964, passed by, the Commissioner, Multan Division, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was rejected.   The facts of the case are that Mansoor Khan, Lambardar, of Chak No. 144/9-L, Tehsil Montgomery, was dismissed and the question of filling up vacancy came up for consideration. Fifteen candidates including the parties applied for the post. Ultimately, the Collector selected the respondent. The petitioner went in appeal to the Commissioner; but it was dismissed. Hence this revision.   I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. It is true that the petitioner had a hereditary claim and had worked as temporary lambardar. The first is only one of the factors to be taken up into consideration and the second does not constitute any right.…