Law:

Section:

 Revision-Interference in second revision can be made only if there had been wrong exercise of jurisdiction or exercise of jurisdiction not vested in Courts below or there was material irregularity or illegality-Question of fact-No interference.   ORDER   This is a second revision filed against an order dated the 15th of November 1965, passed by Additional Commissioner, (Revenue), Rawalpindi, whereby the first revision preferred by the petitioner was dismissed.   The facts of the case are that Mst. Saadat Sultan brought a suit for the recovery of her share of the profits for Kharif 1958 to Kharif 1961. The Assistant Collector, 1st Grade, granted a decree for Rs. 2,107.25 against Ghulam Safdar Khan, petitioner. The petitioner went in appeal to the Collector, but it was dismissed. He then filed a revision before the Additional Commissioner, but it was also rejected. Hence this second revision.   I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. A second revision would be justified only if there had been any wrong exercise of jurisdiction or exercise of jurisdiction not vested in the Courts…