Law:

Section:

  Lambardar-Appointment of Lambardar of Chak carved out of old village-Hereditary claims of candidate can be taken into consideration-Refugees and locals form one community.   Lambardar-Appointment-Concurrent findings of Collector and Commissioner-No interference.   ORDER   This is a revision filed against an order dated the 16th of June 1964, passed by 'Commissioner, Multan, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was rejected.   The facts of the case are that Chak No. 150-B/TDA was carved out of the old village Kunal Thal Jandi. When the question of appointing a Lambardar in this chak came up for consideration, five persons including the parties applied for the post. The Collector considered the claims of the various contestants and appointed the respondent as Lambardar. The petitioner went in appeal to the Commissioner but it was rejected. Hence this revision.   I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. He has stated that the respondent was appointed as Lambardar inspite of the fact that the petitioner had hereditary claims. Such a claim is one of the factors to be taken into consideration) and the petitioner cannot claim overriding preference on that account alone.   The learned counsel for the petitioner has also pointed out that there has been miscarriage of justice because the services rendered by the petitioner's relatives were not given due…