| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1966 SLG 4944 = 1966 SLD 4944 = 1966 PLD 64 |
West Pakistan
Revision No. 5 of 1962-63, decided on 20th August 1963.
Presented By: I. U. Khan
Sh. Ziauddin for Petitioner. Rana Abdur Rahim for
Respondents.
Revision No. 5 of 1962-63, decided on 20th August 1963.
Presented By: I. U. Khan
Sh. Ziauddin for Petitioner. Rana Abdur Rahim for
Respondents.
MOHABAT-Petitioner
VERSUS
Mst. PHATTI AND ANOTHER-Respondents.
Law: West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959
Section: 7,15,19
West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959, paras. 7,15 & 19-Exchange of gifted land with resumed land Resumed land found to be cultivated and tenanted, already sold to tenants concerned-Order of Land Commissioner permitting such exchange, held, inappropriate. ORDER This order will dispose of the following 16 revisions:---- Mohabat v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saida n (Revision No. 5) Alim v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 6) Chattun v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 7) Achar v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 8) Alan v: Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 9) Nooro v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 10) Muhammad v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 11) Khuda Bakhsh v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 12) Piaro v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 13) Murad v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 14) Dineo v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 15) Khan v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 16) Haji v. Mst. Phaltt and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 17) Hasso v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 18) Ramzan v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 19) (16) Obhayo v. Mst. Phatti and Mst. Saidan (Revision No. 20) These 16 revisions have been filed against orders, dated the 20th of June 1963 passed by the Land Commissioner, Hyder abad, whereby he rejected a petition preferred by the petitioners appealing against the orders of the Deputy Land Commissioner, Sanghar. Appeals were filed; but as second appeals do not lie in such cases, these appeals have been treated as revisions. The facts of the case are that Haji Ghulam Qadir Nerejo made gifts in favour of his wife % and daughter in respect of certain lands and also submitted his LC-I and LC-II Forms. The gifts were allowed and he was permitted to retain the permissible area on the basis of the request made in Form LC-II. Subsequently, on 1st July 1961, he submitted an application with the request that the land gifted to his wife and daughter might be allowed to be exchanged with the area resumed from him on the basis of equality of produce index units. The last date for such applications…