| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1981 SLG 3040 = 1981 SLD 3040 = 1981 SCMR 81 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 202 of 1977, heard on 27th April 1980. (On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 1-6-1976 in W. P. No. 1378-S/71).
Presented By: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Shafi-ur-Rehman, JJ
M. Farani, Advocate Supreme Court with M. A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Asad Hussain Zaidi, Advocate Supreme Court with M. A..Qadri Advocate-on-Record for
Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 202 of 1977, heard on 27th April 1980. (On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 1-6-1976 in W. P. No. 1378-S/71).
Presented By: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Shafi-ur-Rehman, JJ
M. Farani, Advocate Supreme Court with M. A. Qureshi, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Asad Hussain Zaidi, Advocate Supreme Court with M. A..Qadri Advocate-on-Record for
Respondents.
Syed AKBAR ALI BOKHARI-Appellant
VERSUS
STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN-Respondent
Law: State Bank of Pakistan Act, 1956
Section: 54(2) (i)
State Bank of Pakistan Act (XXXIII of 1956) S. 54(2) (i) read with Staff Regulations, Regln. 22-Mis conduct-Breach of office procedure/directions-.Dismissal-Apprecia tion of evidence-Disclosure of information-on certain matters sought by appellant full and to complete satisfaction of appellant-Copies of charges framed against certain officials of Bank and their replies and findings of Inquiry Officer sought for by appellant rightly refused on ground of having no relevancy to appellant's charge -Inquiry Officer preparing a list of 20 questions arising out of appellant's reply and calling upon him to furnish further parti culars and. give names of witnesses for his defence and to produce documentary evidence-Appellant in reply elaborating facts, indicating facts, indicating documents4 and identity of witnesses in support of such facts-Inquiry Officer addressing written inquiries to all such persons and offices putting across appellant's versions of facts and seeking their comments and such persons submitting written reports- Reports so received individually examined by Inquiry Officer and a detailed report submitted to competent authority-Competent authority affording personal hearing to appellant after calling upon him to produce evidence in defence but appellant not producing any such evidence and competent authority eventually passing order of dismissal against appellant-Procedure adopted in inquiry in background of no allegation of bias having been made against Inquiry Officer or competent authority-Not objectionable-No violation committed of rule of natural justice in circumstances-Requirements of staff regulation 22 fairly met-Requirements envisaged in S. O. 15 (11) of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968-Not to be transposed in Regulation 22 of Staff Regulation applicable to appellant-None of grounds advanced by appellant having merit, appellant, held, rightly dismissed. Muhammad Shamim v. Pakistan Tobacco Co. 1975 S C M R 46 ; Punjab Road Transport Corporation v. Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal 1973 S C M R 455 ; Punjab Road Transport Corporation v. Punjab Labour Appellate Tribunal, Lahore P L D…