| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1965 SLG 4588 = 1965 SLD 4588 = 1965 PLD 90 |
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal No. 18-D of 1964, decided on 2nd September 1964.
Presented By: A. R. Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman, Fazle-Akbar, B. Z. Kaikaus and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ
Manzur Qadir Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Maksum-ul-Hakim Advocate-General East Pakistan (T. H. Khan Advocate Supreme Court with them) instructed by A. W. Mallik Attorney for Appellants. S. R. Pal Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Shahabuddin Ahmad Senior Attorney for
Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 18-D of 1964, decided on 2nd September 1964.
Presented By: A. R. Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman, Fazle-Akbar, B. Z. Kaikaus and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ
Manzur Qadir Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Maksum-ul-Hakim Advocate-General East Pakistan (T. H. Khan Advocate Supreme Court with them) instructed by A. W. Mallik Attorney for Appellants. S. R. Pal Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Shahabuddin Ahmad Senior Attorney for
Respondent.
THE UNIVERSITY OF DACCA THROUH ITS VICE CHANCELLOR ANDTHE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF DACCA Appellants
VERSUS
ZAKIR AHMED-Respondent
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1962
Section: 98(2)
Law: General Clauses Act (X of 1897)
Section: 39
Law: Dacca University Ordinance (XXIII of 1961)
Section: 4,8,11,42,44
(On appeal from the Judgment and order of the High Court of East Pakistan, Dacca, dated the 7th July 1964, in Writ Petition No. 224 of 1964). Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 98(2)-University of Dacca-"Person performing functions in connection with affairs of Province" within meaning of Art. 98 (2)-General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 39-"Person" - Dacca University Ordinance (XXIII of 1961), Ss. 4, 8, 11, 42 & 44. Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 98-Natural justice Expulsion of student, by University Authorities, for alleged indiscipline, misconduct, and rowdyism-Right of student to be heard before being pronounced guilty-Maxim: audi alteram partem Internal discipline of educational institutions-Principles of natural justice applicable in cases of ex post facto investigation-Duty to observe such principles implied in absence of positive words to that effect in statute or legal document-Requirement of natural justice must depend on circumstances of each case-Court's discretion in issuing orders or directions under Art. 98. Held, that in all proceedings by whomsoever held, whether judicial or administrative, the principles of natural justice have to be observed if the proceedings might result in consequences affecting "the person or property or other right of the parties concerned". This rule applies even though there may be no positive words in the statute or legal document whereby the power is vested to take such proceedings, for, in such cases this requirement is to be implied into it as the minimum requirement of fairness. Chief Commissioner, Karachi v. Mrs. Dina Sohrab Katrak P L D 1959 S C (Pak.) 45; Faridsons Limited v. Government of Pakistan P L D 1961 S C 537 and Abdur Rahman v. Collector and Deputy Commissioner, Bahawalnagar and others P L D 1964 S C 461 ref. Wherever any person or body of persons is empowered to take decisions after ex post facto investigation into facts which would result in consequences affecting the person, property or other right of another person, then in the absence of any express words in the enactment giving such power excluding the applica…