Law:

Section:

(a) Lambardar------   -----Appointment-Police reports not' satisfactory with regard to candidate appointed by Collector-Such objection not of any `great' importance in a locality inhabited by criminal tribes.   (b) Lambardar-----   ----Appointment-Allegation that Lambardar appointed was not paying land revenue "regularly"-Matter, held, merits independent departmental consideration by Collector Rival candidate cannot derive any benefit from such objection.   ORDER   This is a revision filed against an order dated the 17th of December 1963, passed by the Commissioner, Multan Division, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was rejected.   The facts of the case are that the respondent was appointed as a Lambardar by the Collector. 'The petitioner went in appeal but it was rejected. Hence this revision.   I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the record. It has been urged before me that the police reports against the…