| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 4314 = 2026 SLD 4314 = 2026 SCP 230 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
C.A. No. 28-L, 29-L & 30-L/2011 [Against the judgement dated 30.08.2010 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore, in C.R. No. 884/2003]
Presented By: Ms. JUSTICE MUSARRAT HILALI Mr. JUSTICE SHAHID BILAL HASSAN
Mr. Rao Tariq Mehmood, ASC. (In all cases for
Respondents No. 2,4 & 6)
C.A. No. 28-L, 29-L & 30-L/2011 [Against the judgement dated 30.08.2010 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore, in C.R. No. 884/2003]
Presented By: Ms. JUSTICE MUSARRAT HILALI Mr. JUSTICE SHAHID BILAL HASSAN
Mr. Rao Tariq Mehmood, ASC. (In all cases for
Respondents No. 2,4 & 6)
Sultan Ahmad & another …Appellant(s)
VERSUS
Muhammad Azam (deceased) through LRs & others. …Respondent(s)
Law:
Section:
Summary The Supreme Court of Pakistan allowed the appeal and dismissed the pre-emption suit, holding that the impugned transaction was an exchange (badal) and not a sale, so no right of pre-emption arose; additionally, the pre-emptor failed to prove mandatory procedural requirements, including proper service of the Talb-i-Ishhad notice and disclosure of the source of knowledge of the sale consideration. Core Points The mutation and surrounding circumstances showed the parties exchanged their respective properties, not a sale. Pre-emption is a “weak right” that restricts an owner’s freedom to alienate property and must be strictly construed; it arises only on a sale. The burden lay on the pre-emptor to prove the transaction was, in substance, a sale despite being recorded as an exchange; this burden was not discharged. Even independently, the pre-emptor failed to establish mandatory pre-emption requirements: the Talb-i-Ishhad notice was not proved in accordance with law. The postman who allegedly effected service of the registered notice was not produced despite the defendants’ denial; such failure is fatal where service is disputed. The pre-emptor also failed to disclose the source of his knowledge of the sale consideration, which undermines the statutory basis for asserting pre-emption. Result: High Court and Appellate Court judgments set aside; Trial Court’s dismissal of the pre-emption suit restored. Law and Key Principles Issue / Requirement Governing Law / Principle Key Case Authority Pre-emption arises only on sale, not exchange (badal) Statutory pre-emption regimes (e.g., Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1991; KPK Pre-emption Act, 1987) restrict right to sales; strict construction of pre-emption provisions Muhammad Mushtaq v. Malik Mutaz (2026 SCMR 54); Supreme Court 2026 ruling on exchange vs sale Burden of proof on pre-emptor to show transaction is a sale General principle: party asserting a right must prove its foundation; pre-emption is a weak right Muhammad Mushtaq (2026 SCMR 54) Talb-i-Ishhad notice: issuance and service requirements Notice must be sent within two weeks of knowledge, attested by two truthful witnesses, via…