Law: N.W. F. P. Tenancy Act (XXV of 1910)

Section: 54

 N.W. F. P. Tenancy Act (XXV of 1910)------   -----S. 54-Appeal does not lie against orders refusing to review or confirming on review a previous order-Appeal not allowed to be treated as Revision against original order made subject of review, because appeal itself was against order passed in review and original order was not touched upon at all in memorandum of appeal.   ORDER   This order will dispose of the following four appeals:-   Latif v. Muhammad Khan Appeal No. 271 of 1963-64.   Mir Zaman v. Muhammad Khan Appeal No. 272 of 1963-64.   Yousaf v. Muhammad Khan Appeal No. 273 of 1963-64.   Hussain v. Dr. Umer Khan Appeal No. 274 of 1963-64.   These four appeals have been filed against orders dated the 23rd of July 1964, passed by the Additional Commissioner (Revenue), Peshawar, whereby the review applications preferred by the appellants against the Additional Commissioner's orders dated the 8th of June 1964, were dismissed, and the previous order was confirmed.   The facts of the case are that the appellants filed suits for contesting the liability for ejectment under section 28 of the N.W. F. P. Tenancy Act, as a notice of ejectment had been given by the respondents. The Assistant Collector dismissed the suit in view of the deficiency of court-fee stamp. The appellants went in appeal to the Collector but the appeal was dismissed. The appellants then went in revisions to the Additional Commissioner who ordered that the…