Law:

Section: 15,16

Lambardar-----   -----Candidate not owning any land in Patti (sub division of estate)-Cannot be considered for appointment "at all" -Punjab Land Revenue Rules, rr. 15 & 16 (i) (c)-Rule 16 (i) (c) mandatory-[P L D 1964 W. P. (Rev.) 16 dissented from]. ORDER   This is a revision filed against an order dated the 30th of December 1963, passed by the Additional Commissioner (Revenue), Multan, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was rejected.   The facts of the case are that, on the death of Kalu Lambar dar, the respondent was appointed as Lambardar. The petitioner went in appeal but it was rejected. Hence this revision.   I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. It was established that the petitioner does not own any land in the Patti. It was primarily for this reason that his claim was rejected by the learned Collector. The learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to P L D 1964 W. P. (Rev.) 16. It is true that, in this ruling, it was held that it was not necessary that the candidate should own land in the Patti. It would be sufficient if he owns land in the estate as a whole. The provisions of rule…