Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302(b), 365-A, 34

Law: Explosive Substances Act, 1908

Section: 4, 5

Law: Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997

Section: 7

Law: Sindh Arms Act, 2013

Section: 23(1)(a)

Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)

Section: 22

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Ss. 302(b), 365-A & 34---Explosive Substances Act (VI of 1908), Ss. 4 & 5---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7---Sindh Arms Act (V of 2013), S.23(1)(a)---Qatl-i-amd, kidnapping or abducting for extorting property, valuable security, etc., common intention, making or possessing explosive substances under suspicious circumstances, possession of illicit weapon---Appreciation of evidence---Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997---Not applicable---Sentence, modification of---Accused were charged for committing murder of the father of complainant after kidnapping him for extorting money---As per record, on the pointation of accused persons, one hand grenade was recovered from an accused, one unlicensed 30-bore pistol with a loaded magazine was recovered from other accused and one unlicensed 30-bore pistol with a loaded magazine was recovered from another accused---Mere inclusion of offences such as kidnapping for ransom or the unlawful use or control of explosive substances within subsection (2) of S.6 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 (ATA), or their listing in the Schedule appended thereto, did not per se empower the Court to invoke the sentencing provisions contained in S.7(1)(e) or 7(1)(ff) of the Act---Moreover, it would be contrary to legislative logic to simultaneously treat such offences as Schedule Offences and, in the same breath, presumed them to constitute acts of terrorism without satisfying the definitional threshold prescribed under S.6---Legislature had deliberately drawn a distinction between offences enumerated in the Schedule and those that, by their nature and circumstances, fulfilled the criteria of terrorism under S.6---Statutory scheme of the Anti-Terrorism Act clearly reflected that the application of S.7 was conditional upon the establishment of a substantive nexus between the alleged act and the elements of terrorism-namely, the creation of terror, insecurity, or panic among the public with intent, act, purpose or design for terrorism---In the absence of such linkage, the Court was bound to restrict its sentencing jurisdiction to the penal consequences provided under the Schedule or the substantive law governing…