| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 4228 = 2026 SLD 4228 = 2026 YLR 1144 |
Sindh High Court
Civil Revision Application No. 201 of 2002, decided on 11th March, 2025.
Presented By: Jan Ali Junejo, J
Haji Wajdad v. Provincial Government Through Secretary Board of Revenue Government of Balochsitan, Quetta and others 2020 SCMR 2046 rel. Ravi Kumar Jethanand for Applicants. Faisal Ahmed for
Respondent.
Civil Revision Application No. 201 of 2002, decided on 11th March, 2025.
Presented By: Jan Ali Junejo, J
Haji Wajdad v. Provincial Government Through Secretary Board of Revenue Government of Balochsitan, Quetta and others 2020 SCMR 2046 rel. Ravi Kumar Jethanand for Applicants. Faisal Ahmed for
Respondent.
ABDUL AZIZ and others---Applicants
VERSUS
ALI MUHAMMAD SHAH---Respondent
Law: Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)
Section: 8, 42, 54
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: O.XLI, R.31, 115
(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) Ss.8, 42 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XLI, R.31---Suit for possession based on title---Competing title claims over evacuee property---Identity and existence of property---Courts below ordering demarcation of suit property---Scope---Briefly, the respondent instituted a suit for possession, mandatory injunction and permanent injunction regarding suit property asserting allotment of the property by the Settlement Department in 1968 as evacuee property; the applicants contested the suit on the basis of an earlier allotment in 1965 in favour of the father of applicant No. 1 and denied the respondent s title; Trial Court decreed the suit, the appeal thereagainst was dismissed, and the applicants thereafter filed the present civil revision against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the Courts below---Held: Courts below did not exceed their jurisdiction by ordering demarcation of the suit property as this was a necessary and ancillary relief to effectuate the decree for possession---Respondent s claim was primarily supported by valid allotment and transfer documents---Suit filed by respondent was maintainable and the respondent had successfully substantiated his entitlement to the suit property---Present civil revision was dismissed, in circumstances. (b) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877) Ss.8 & 42---Suit for possession on the basis of title---Implicit determination of ownership---Separate declaratory relief not mandatory---In a suit for possession the Court inherently evaluates and acknowledges the plaintiff s title to the property---The relief of declaration in possession suits based on title is an implicit component---Once the Court determines that the plaintiff is entitled to recover possession, a separate declaration is not a mandatory requirement---Consequently, the absence of a specific prayer for the declaration of title does not render the suit unsustainable. (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) S.115---Revisional jurisdiction of the High Court---Scope---High Court can only interfere if the subordinate court has (i) exercised a jurisdiction not vested in it by law; or (ii) failed to exercise a…