| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1962 SLG 2999 = 1962 SLD 2999 = 1962 PLD 786 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 289 of 1960, decided on 3rd April, 1962.
Presented By:Shabir Ahmad and Nazeer Ahmed Mahmood, JJ
Sh. Muhammad Shag for Petitioner. Gul Muhammad Khan for
Respondent No. 3. Nemo for other
Respondents. Dates of hearing : 22nd and 23rd February 1962.
Writ Petition No. 289 of 1960, decided on 3rd April, 1962.
Presented By:Shabir Ahmad and Nazeer Ahmed Mahmood, JJ
Sh. Muhammad Shag for Petitioner. Gul Muhammad Khan for
Respondent No. 3. Nemo for other
Respondents. Dates of hearing : 22nd and 23rd February 1962.
Qazi GHULAM AHMAD-Petitioner
VERSUS
J. F. ELAHI, ELECTION TRIBUNAL, CHAKWAL, AND OTHERSRespondents
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1956
Section: Art. 170
West Pakistan Basic Democracies Election Rules, 1959, r.55-Order of Election Tribunal-Final-Order, however, not immune from scrutiny by Court competent to issue writ of mandamus or certiorari-Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Art. 170. Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Art. 170-Powers of Court competent to issue writ vis-a-vis powers of appellate or revisional authority-Order of Tribunal of special jurisdiction. When can be interfered with in exercise of writ jurisdiction. An appellate or revisional authority has a right to go into the merits of the questions which may be agitated before it, but the powers of a Court which can issue a writ of mandamus or certiorari extend to seeing whether the Tribunal whose order is attacked by means of a writ petition has acted in a manner in which it could not have acted or has refused to act as it could and should have acted, and to passing an appro priate order if the Court comes to the conclusions that one of the two aforementioned defects exist in the order of the Tribunal of exclusive jurisdiction. If by giving a wrong decision on question of law, a Tribunal of special jurisdiction has arrived at a conclusion that it bad no jurisdiction in the matter in which it actually had jurisdiction or has arrived at the conclusion that it has jurisdiction in a matter in which it had none, occasion for exercise of writ jurisdiction by a Court possessing that jurisdiction arises. West Pakistan Basic Democracies Election Rules, 1959, rr. 55 (3), 27 (4) & 2 (5)-Words "contesting candidate" in sub- rule (3) of r. 55-Definition given in clause (5) of r. 2 not applic able-Candidate failing to supply requisite number of ballot boxes and deemed to have retired from election by virtue of r. 27 (4) Cannot be deemed to be "contesting candidate" for purposes of sub -rule (3) of r. 5J-Non joinder of such candidate as respondent, does not render election petition invalid. Words and phrase-"Perverse" and "wrong"-Whether distinct. JUDGMENT SHABIR AHMAD, J.-The main questions that arise in this writ petition and Writ Petition No. 386 of 1960 are identical and…