Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: 1(r) , 2 , 104

  Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O.XLIII, R.1(r), O.XXXIX, Rr.l, 2 & S. 104---Appeal against grant of injunction---Maintainability---Any order of granting or refusing injunction, ad interim or otherwise, would be covered by O.XXXIX, Rr.l & 2, C.P.C. and thus, appealable in terms of O.XLIII, R. 1(r) & S. 104, C.P.C. Umer Gul v. Malik Abdul Manan and others PLD 1992 Pesh. 76; H.M. Saya & Co. v. Wazir Ali Industries and another PLD 1965 Kar. 603; H.M. Saya & Co., Karachi v. Wazir Ali Industries Ltd. Karachi and another PLD 1969 SC 65; Returning Officer, Karachi Municipal Corporation v. Hafiz Muhammad Habibullah and others PLD 1956 Kar. 429; Balabh Das v. Muhammad Ishaq AIR 1933 Lah. 282; Zila Parishad Budaun and others v. Brahma Rishi Sharma AIR 1970 All. 376; Amolak Ram v. Sahib Singh ILR 7 All. 550; Lachmi Narain v. Ram Charan Das ILR 35 All. 425; Ganesh Prasad Sahu v. Dukh Haram Sabu AIR 1922 All. 441(1), District Board of Farrakhabad v. Ikhlaque Hussain AIR 1933 All. 86 and Shyam Behari Singh v. Biseswar Dayal Singh AIR 1924 Pat. 713 ref. Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O.XLIII,            R.3---Appeal                               against                               interim order---Essentials---Appellant giving notice to respondents by registered post acknowledgement due, before filing   appeal---Procedural provisions of law having been substantially complied with, appeal was competent. Sindh Industrial Trading Estate Ltd and 3 others v Noorani Enterprises 1996 CLC 570 rel. Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O. XXXIX, Rr. 1, 2, 2A & 3---Ex parte ad interim injunction granted in favour of plaintiffs---Validity---Court before granting injunction was required to give notice to opposite-party---Impugned order did not show any extreme urgency nor it was spelt…