Case Details

Citation(s)
1978 SLG 433 1978 SLD 433 (1978) 111 ITR 184
Punjab and Haryana High Court
IT REFERENCE No. 67 OF 1974, OCTOBER 20, 1976
O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, ACTG., C.J. AND M.R. SHARMA, J.
R.P. Sawhney for the Applicant. D.N. Awasthy and B.K. Jhingan for the
Respondent

Kartar Singh

v.

Commissioner of IncomE tax

Law:

Section:

JUDGMENT Deb, J. —The following question is involved in this reference under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the conclusion of the Tribunal that the break-up value of the shares of Messrs. Lal Holdings (P.) Ltd. should be determined on the basis of its balance-sheet figures was in accordance with law?" The reference relates to the wealth-tax assessment years 1963-64 and 1964-65, for which the respective valuation dates are March 31, 1963, and March 31, 1964. The assessee held certain shares in two private limited companies, namely, M/s. S. Lal & Co. (P.) Ltd. and M/s. Lal Holdings (P.) Ltd. Messrs. Lal Holdings (P.) Ltd. held certain shares in Messrs. S. Lal & Co. (P.) Ltd. The shares held by the assessee in these two companies were valued by the Wealth-tax Officer by adopting the break-up method of valuation of assets and not on the basis of book value of those shares. The appellate authorities had set aside the said valuation by holding that though the break-up method of valuation was permissible in the case of these two companies, it was not applicable in the case of an assessee-shareholder and the shares held by Messrs. S. Lal & Co. (P.) Ltd. in Messrs. Lal Holdings (P.) Ltd. should be valued on the basis of their book value as shown in the balance-sheet of the former company without any such adjustment and dismissed the appeals filed by the department. Mr. B.L. Pal, learned counsel for the revenue, has questioned the validity of the above reasonings and has urged that the break-up method of valuation of assets has been accepted by the Tribunal and, therefore, if it is held that this method is not applicable in the case of the assessee, it would lead to an anomalous position. It has been held by the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Wealth-tax v. Mahadeo Jalan [1972] 86 ITR 621(SC), that the shares can be valued in the hands of a shareholder-assessee by adopting the recognised methods of valuation of shares and their application will depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. In the case ofCommissioner of Wealth-tax v. Mohanlal Nopany [1970] 78 ITR 435…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492