| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1997 SLD 747 = 1997 CLC 1212 |
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petition No.2021 and Miscellaneous Application Nos. 4477 and 4478 of 1995, decided on 20th December, 1995.
Presented By: Before Abdul Majid Khanzada and Abdul Latif U. Qureshi, JJ
M.S. Qureshi for Petitioner. Farooq Rashid for
Respondents.
Constitutional Petition No.2021 and Miscellaneous Application Nos. 4477 and 4478 of 1995, decided on 20th December, 1995.
Presented By: Before Abdul Majid Khanzada and Abdul Latif U. Qureshi, JJ
M.S. Qureshi for Petitioner. Farooq Rashid for
Respondents.
AIRPORT SUPPORT SERVICES and 3 others-- Petitioners
VERSUS
THE AIR PORT MANAGER, CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY, KARACHI and 2 others-- Respondents
Law: Central Government Lands and Buildings (Recovery of Possession) Ordinance, 1965
Section: 3 , 73 , 199
Central Government Lands and Buildings (Recovery of Possession) Ordinance (LIV of 1965)--- ----S.3---Contract Act (IX of 1872), S.73---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199---Constitutional jurisdiction, exercise of---Competency---Petitioners were awarded licences for passenger facilitation/assistance service and office accommodation at Airport by Civil Aviation Authority---Cancellation of such licence agreements by Authority before expiry of contractual period without notice---Validity---Issuance of licence would not create vested right---Licence was granted on strength of agreement between parties---Where licence was terminated without giving mandatory notice in terms of agreement in question, such act would amount to only breach of contract, for which efficacious and alternate remedy by way of filing suit before competent Civil Court was available---Breach of terms of contract would not amount to breach of Constitutional right of citizen Constitutional petition would not be maintainable for enforcing contractual obligations between parties Proper remedy available with petitioners would be by way of filing suit before Civil Court ---Parties for alleged breach of contract would have to lead evidence to prove such contract which was not possible in Constitutional petition In addition, there being clause of arbitration in agreement in question, same was also sort of alternate remedy available to petitioners for resolving dispute in question arising between them---Constitutional petition being not maintainable was dismissed in circumstances. Tawakal General Export Corporation v. Collector of Customs (Export), Karachi PLD 1992 Kar. 199; M/s. Abdullah & Co. v. Porvince of Sindh 1992 MLD 293; Rice Export Corporation of Pakistan v. K.M.C. PLD 1990 Kar.186; Wilayat Ali Mir v.PRA. 1995 SCMR 650; Nizamuddin and others v. Civil Aviation Authority C.P. No. D-2052 of 1992 and C.P. No. D-2586 of 1983 ref. M.S. Qureshi for Petitioner. Farooq Rashid for Respondents. Date of hearing: 20th December, 1995. ORDER Facts of the case are that petitioners were awarded Licences for Passenger…