Law:

Section:

(a) Tort--- ---- Damages for malicious prosecution---Two Courts below        on basis of evidence on record had dismissed suit for damages against malicious presecution---Both Courts   below had given concurrent findings     of fact and there was no good reason to interfere with them in revisional jurisdiction---Appellate Court beiipg Court         of facts was quite competent to believe/disbelieve evidence disbelived/believed by Trial Court---Appellate Court had applied      its mind       and had given good reasons in support of conclusion arrived at by it-- Revisions being without merits were dismissed in circumstances.---[Damages].PLD 1970 Kar. 346 and Muhammad Tufail v. Ghulam Ullah and others 1991 MLD 53 rel. Muhammad Tufail   v.   Ghulam Ullah and other     1991 MLD 53 and Abdul Razzaq v. Abdul Rauf and another PLD 1986 Kar. 476 ref. (b) Malicious prosecution--- ---- Suit for damages for malicious prosecution---Neither copy                  of judgment of Magistrate whereby plaintiffs were acquitted was     placed on record nor copy of First Information Report was produced in Court---Reference to order of Magistrate, however, showed that plaintiffs were acquitted only for non appearance of Investigating Officer and non-production of case   property---Order of acquittal, thus, did not indicate that prosecution case was malicious or baseless---Plaintiffs failed to place before Court any documentary evidence brought on record and also failed to prove that defendants had initiated malicious prosecution against them or that First Information Report registered against them was false---Judgments and decrees of Courts below dismissing plaintiff's suit was affirmed in circumstances PLD       1970 Kar.       757; 1984      CLC 325 and Abdul Razzaq v. Abdul Rauf and another PLD 1984…