| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1973 SLG 3026 = 1973 SLD 3026 = 1973 PCRLJ 132 |
Court of Special Judge, Karachi
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 23 of 1971, decided on 9th August 1971
Presented By: Imdadally H. Agha, J
M. Shah for Appellants. A. A. K. Zai for
Respondent No. 1. A. d. Mohammedally for the State.
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 23 of 1971, decided on 9th August 1971
Presented By: Imdadally H. Agha, J
M. Shah for Appellants. A. A. K. Zai for
Respondent No. 1. A. d. Mohammedally for the State.
MUHAMMAD ALI AND 3 OTHERS-Applicants
VERSUS
AMIR HASAN SIDDIQUI AND ANOTHER--Respondents
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 363, 420
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 363-Kidnapping-Minor girl in curtody of mother alleged to have been taken away by mother to another town-No offence of kidnapping, held, made out. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 420-Cheating-Jurisdic Lion-Money allegedly obtained by accused by cheating paid in district A---Courts In district B, held, had no jurisdiction to try case. Date of hearing: 9th August 1971. JUDGMENT This is an application under section 561-A, Cr. P. C. by the four applicants, Mohammad Ali, Shafiqullah, Shafiq and Mst. Rabia Begum for quashing a criminal direct complaint against them filed by opponent No. 1 Amir Hassan Siddiqi in the Court of A. C. M. No. 18, Karachi. 2. The facts necessary to decide this application briefly are these. The opponent No. 1 filed the criminal complaint above mentioned against the applicants in the said .Court in which he stated that he was married to applicant No. 4 Mst. Rabia Begum in India and after migration he started living with her at Manghopir Road in the area of Police Station Kala Kot, Karachi. They had a daughter Mst. Nilofar born at Manghopir Road. Karachi whose age at this time was about 10 years. Applicant No. 1 was the, brother-in-law of applicant No. 4, that is, the wife of the complainant and applicant No. 2 is the father of applicant No. 4. The complaint further shows that the complainant had divorced the applicant No. 4 after which the applicant No. 4 started living in Mahmoodabad at Karachi. At the time of divorce there was art agreement entered into between the complainant-opponent No. 1 and applicant No. 4 relevant terms of which were as follows: - That during the subsistence of marriage a child Nilofar Sultana was born from Amir Hasan Siddiqi, at Karachi whose age at thisβ¦