| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1978 SLG 310 1978 SLD 310 1978 PLD 298 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
ANWARUL HAQ, C.J., QAISER KHAN AND G. SAFDAR SHAH, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
ANWARUL HAQ, C.J., QAISER KHAN AND G. SAFDAR SHAH, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMAD ASLAM AND ANOTHER
VS
THE STATE
Law:
Section:
(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)-- Art. 185(3)-Leave to appeal to Supreme Court once granted in a criminal matter-Whole case opened for examination, unless some points specifically repelled in order granting leave to appeal.-[Leave to appeal]. (b) Evidence Act (I of 1972)- -- S. 32-Dying declaration-Expression "any of the circumstances of the transaction resulted in his death" occurring in S. 32-Wider in scope than expression "the cause of his death" occurring in same section-Words "resulted in his death"-Do not mean "caused his death"-Law makes admissible not only statement dealing directly with cause of death but also a statement as to any of circumstances of transaction resulting in victim's death provided circumstances proximately related to actual occurrence-Expression "in regard to any of the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death "Held, includes (in cases where cause of dying declarants' death comes into question) circumstances in which dying declarant's companion may have been done to death in course of same transaction-[Fakir v. The Empress 17 P R 1901 not approved].-[Dying declaration-Words and phrases]. Fakir v. The Empress 17 P R 1901 not approved. Saudagar Singh v. Emperor A I R 1944 Lah 377 distinguished. Mian Khan v. The Crown P L D 1954 Lah 646 ; Nisar Muhammad v. Khanzali and another P L D 1959 Pesh. 115 and Pakala Narayana Sawami v. The King-Emperor 66 1 A 66 ref. Per Anwaral Haq, C. J., Qaiser Khan and G. Safdar Shah, JJ.- (c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)- -- S. 164 read with Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 32-Dying declaration-Recording and admissibility of-Dying declaration in order to be admissible in evidence need not necessarily be recorded much less recorded in accordance with provisions contained in Chap. XXV of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898-Dying declaration admissible in evidence even if made orally-Provisions of S. 32, Evidence Act, 1872.Not dependent on, or circumscribed by, provisions of S. 164, Criminal Procedure Code, 1898-Dying statement recorded by Naib-Tehsildar, exercising powers of III Class Magistrate, held, not inadmissible in evidence.-[Dying declaration]. Allah Bakhsh and others v. Crown…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492