| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2026 SLG 3711 = 2026 SLD 3711 = 2026 PLD 388 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Revision No. 205 of 2025, decided on 30th May, 2025.
Presented By: Sadiq Mahmud Khurram, J
Haseeb Khan for Petitioner. Umar Farooq Khan, Additional Prosecutor General, Mahar Muhammad Iqbal Sargana, Assistant Attorney General for Pakistan and Muhammad Ahmad Raja, Law Officer, NADRA Multan for the State. Bilal Ahmad Gorchani for
Respondents Nos. 3 to 6.
Criminal Revision No. 205 of 2025, decided on 30th May, 2025.
Presented By: Sadiq Mahmud Khurram, J
Haseeb Khan for Petitioner. Umar Farooq Khan, Additional Prosecutor General, Mahar Muhammad Iqbal Sargana, Assistant Attorney General for Pakistan and Muhammad Ahmad Raja, Law Officer, NADRA Multan for the State. Bilal Ahmad Gorchani for
Respondents Nos. 3 to 6.
ABDUL REHMAN ---Petitioner
VERSUS
The STATE and 5 others ---Respondents
Law: National Database and Registration Authority Ordinance, 2000
Section: 18
Law: Passports Act, 1974
Section: 8
National Database and Registration Authority Ordinance (VIII of 2000) S. 18---Passports Act (XX of 1974), S. 8---Power to cancel, impound or confiscate Computerized National Identity Card, Passport and Bank Account---Jurisdiction of Courts---Scope---Petitioner was the complainant of a case FIR and after the investigation of the case, report under S.173, Cr.P.C., was submitted and the charge against the accused was framed, which they denied and claimed trial---Thereafter, the Trial Court proceeded to summon the prosecution witnesses including the petitioner who was the complainant of the case however, despite repeated orders of the Trial Court, the prosecution witnesses including the petitioner did not appear before the Trial Court whereby the Trial Court proceeded to pass the impugned order dated 10.04.2025, directing that the Computerized National Identity Card (CNIC), Passport and Bank Accounts of the petitioner be "blocked"---Validity---As per S.18(1) of the National Database and Registration Authority Ordinance, 2000, only authority which lies with National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) with regard to any Computerized National Identity Card (CNIC) of a citizen, is that it may cancel, impound or confiscate the said Computerized National Identity Card (CNIC)---In this regard, S.18 of the National Database and Registration Authority Ordinance, 2000, specifically provided reasons for cancelling impounding or confiscating the Computerized National Identity Cards (CNIC)---Trial Court had no authority under the law to direct such cancellation, impounding or confiscation of the Computerized National Identity Card (CNIC) of the petitioner---In this manner, the impugned order passed by the Trial Court suffered from a lack of jurisdiction---Furthermore, with regard to the part of the order whereby the Trial Court directed that the passport of the petitioner be also "blocked", the conditions in which, the cancelling, impounding or confiscation of a passport could be ordered have been detailed in S.8 of the Passports Act, 1974, and the said provisions did not allow the Trial Court to order such cancellation, impounding or confiscation…