Law: West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959.

Section: 13

West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (V1 of 1959)  S. 13-Ejectment-Personal need-Premises occupied by appellant belonging to her father-in-law and accommodation shared by appellant with her in-laws-Appellant having had a quarrel with her mother-in-law her father-in-law asking appellant to get out of his house-Such premises not belonging to appellant being asked by owner to quit same appellant, held, required premises in suit for her personal bona fide requirement. Muhammad Sideliq v. Abdul Hameed P L D 1976 Kar. 696 and Abdul Salam Akhtar v. Dr. Najam Parvez 1976 S C M R 52 distinguished. Mansoor Ahmad v. Bashir Hussain Bahri P L D 1977 Lah. 532 ref. Date of hearing : 22nd December, 1979.                                                                                                                               JUDGMENT This second appeal has been filed by a landlady, Ust. Sajida Bano, who succeeded in securing an ejectment order against her tenant. Mst. Maqsoodan Begum, from a Rent Controller but, on an appeal having been filed by the tenant, the order of the learned Rent Controller was set aside by an Additional District Judge and the landlady's application for her ejectment was dismissed. The landlady has, therefore, challenged the order of the appellate authority by means of this second appeal. 2. The appellant had sought ejectment of the tenant, who is respon dent in the instant appeal, from a house on the ground of personal-need. As stated above, her plea was accepted by the learned Rent Controller but it did not find favour with the learned Additional District Judge. The main reason given by the learned Additional District Judge for, non-suiting the appellant was that she was already having a house and since the accommo dation in that house was not less than the accommodation available in the disputed house, her requirement…