| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1995 SLD 739 = 1995 CLC 574 |
Peshawar High Court
Writ Petition No. 7$5 and Civil Miscellaneous No. 921 of 1994, heard on 19th October, 1994.
Presented By: Before Abdul Karim Khan Kundi, CJ and Nasirul Mu1lk, J
Yahya Khan Afridi for Petitioner. Tahir Hussain Lughmani, Asstt. A.G. for
Respondents Nos, to 4. Farooq Aslam Khan, A.G. for
Respondent No. 5.
Writ Petition No. 7$5 and Civil Miscellaneous No. 921 of 1994, heard on 19th October, 1994.
Presented By: Before Abdul Karim Khan Kundi, CJ and Nasirul Mu1lk, J
Yahya Khan Afridi for Petitioner. Tahir Hussain Lughmani, Asstt. A.G. for
Respondents Nos, to 4. Farooq Aslam Khan, A.G. for
Respondent No. 5.
Dr. GULAB SHER ---Petitioner
VERSUS
GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Chief Secretary and 4 others---Respondents
Law: General Clauses Act (X of 1897)
Section: 21 , 199
General Clauses Act (X of 1897)--- ----S. 21---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199---Constitutional petition-- Locus poenitentiae, principle of---Authorities retracing their steps when valuable rights had accrued to petitioner---Validity---Petitioner having applied for scholarship for studying abroad, was communicated approval of scholarship by Authorities-'--Such approval appeared to be unequivocal with no condition attached and on the strength of such approval petitioner was issued certificate for grant of scholarship to him alongwith air ticket---Petitioner being in Government service had obtained study leave and No-Objection Certificate duly approved by Governor-Petitioner, on arrival at the place of his destination was initially paid one month's allowance by the High Commission of Pakistan 'and subsequently a substantial amount as yearly allowance-- Petitioner had by now completed his first term of study course in the relevant field---Decision granting scholarship to petitioner had thus, been given effect to and decisive step had been taken thereby creating valuable right in favour of petitioner---Authorities thus, did not possess locus poenitentiae to recall the orders when the same had taken effect due to any error made by the Authorities and when petitioner was not in any manner guilty of misrepresentation or suppression of material facts.---[Locus poenitentiae]. Pakistan v. Muhammad Himayatullah PLD 1969 SC 407; Muhammad Aslam Khaki v. Vice-Chancellor; Gomal University, 0.1. Khan PLD 1980 Pesh.128 and Ghulam Mustafa v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1982 CLC 1665 ref. Wali Muhammad v. Sakhi Muhammad 1974 SCMR 106 ref. Constitution of Pakistan (1973)--- ----Art. 199---Vested right---Recalling of vested right---Effect---Vested right was created in favour of petitioner when Authorities granted him foreign scholarship for studying abroad in the field of medicines---Such scholarship was reserved for doctors in medicines domiciled in Federally Administered Tribal Areas---Petitioner was granted study leave and…