Case Details

Citation(s)
1962 SLG = 1962 SLD 2579 = 1962 PLD 28
Quetta High Court
  Second Civil Appeal No. 1 of 1960, decided on 2nd November 1961.  
Presented By: Wahiduddin Ahmed and A. S. Faruqui, JJ  
  S. M. Arif, Mir Muhammad Fazil and Mohd. Nawaz Ahmad for Appellants.   Qazi Mohd Issa, Muhammad Ahmad Mirza and Syed Riazul Hassan for
Respondents.   Dates of hearing : 11 th and 12th October 1961.

Mst. BIBI LAL BIBI-Appellant  

VERSUS

  MIR BALUCH KHAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: S. 87-A

  Baluchistan States Union Interim Constitution, 1952, S. 86-Bar against Courts' jurisdiction not operative where Ruler has acquiesced in cognizance of proceedings against him by Court (Kazi's)-Repeal of Interim Constitution by Establishment of West Pakistan Act, 1955-Bar no longer in force-Interim Constitution not valid legislation[Madad Khan v. Province of West Pakistan P L D 1960 Kar. 160 ref.]   Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 87-A read with S. 86-Kharan State (Baluchistan) not a "merged" State-"Nawab" of Kharan not "Ruler" of an Acceding State-S. 86 inapplicable to Kharan State or its "Nawab".   (Kalat) Dastur-ul-Amal Diwani - Still in force, being special Law-Application of Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) Doubtful.   Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 86-Applies to "suits" against Rulers of States and not "appeals"-"Suit" does not include "appeal" in context of S. 86-"Suit"Definition.   The word `suit' ordinarily means and apart from some context must be taken to mean, a civil proceeding instituted by the presentation of plaint. 1n the context of section 86, C. P. C., this is the only meaning which can be given to the word "suit" which should not be taken to include "appeal."   Hansraj Gupta and others v. Dehra Dun-Mussorie Electric Tramway Co., Ltd. A I R 1933 P C 63 ref.   Acceding States (Property) Order (12 of 1961), Art. 3 Does not apply to property which is property neither of State nor of its Ruler.   (Kalat) Dastur-ul-Amal Diwani-Not making provision for impleading heirs of Ruler in any proceeding on Ruler's death-- Procedure for impleading heirs nevertheless applies being an inherent principle in administration of justice-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXII.   Party-May be impleaded at any time provided claim is not time-barred-Civil Procedure Code (V oj'1908), O. I, r. 10--- Principle applied to case governed by (Kalat) Dastur-ul-Amal Diwani.   Partition suit-Parties---Some heirs not made parties but estate of deceased sufficiently represen!ed before…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register