Case Details

Citation(s)
1962 SLG = 1962 SLD 2567 = 1962 PLD 20
West Pakistan
Appellate Side No. 115/17 of 1960-61, decided on 18th February 1961, District Multan.  
Presented By: Nasir Ahmed, Member Board of Revenue
Abdul Jabbar for Petitioner.   Abdul Latif for
Respondent.  

  FATEH DIN-Appellant  

VERSUS

  MOOR MUHAMMAD-Respondent  

Law:

Section:

Lambardar-Appointment-Extent of property in estate, one of the factors to be taken into consideration-Collector appointing candidate as Lambardar after considering all matters Commissioner not to upset order of Collector and appoint candidate holding larger area.   Mashir Ali v. Chiragh Khan P L D 1950 Ph. (Rev.) 925 rel.     ORDER   This is a second appeal regarding the Lambardari of Chak No. 158-A/10-R, District Multan. The Collector on the recom mendations of the officers below appointed the appellant Fateh Din on the ground of his personal services ; he was an ex-soldier having served as a Havaldar for a considerable period and had acted satisfactorily as a temporary Lambardar. The learned Commissioner intervened in appeal in favour of the respondent Nur Muhammad on the sole ground that he was the owner of a considerably larger area. Fateh Din has come up in second appeal.   The main point that has been urged is that the mere fact that Nur Muhammad was the owner of a much larger holding than Fateh Din, is not sufficient for setting aside the latter's appointment. Reliance in this connection is placed on Mashir Ali v. Malik Chirag Khan (P L D 1950 Ph. (Rev.) 950) a ruling which has…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register