| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1962 SLG = 1962 SLD 2567 = 1962 PLD 20 |
West Pakistan
Appellate Side No. 115/17 of 1960-61, decided on 18th February 1961, District Multan.
Presented By: Nasir Ahmed, Member Board of Revenue
Abdul Jabbar for Petitioner. Abdul Latif for
Respondent.
Appellate Side No. 115/17 of 1960-61, decided on 18th February 1961, District Multan.
Presented By: Nasir Ahmed, Member Board of Revenue
Abdul Jabbar for Petitioner. Abdul Latif for
Respondent.
FATEH DIN-Appellant
VERSUS
MOOR MUHAMMAD-Respondent
Law:
Section:
Lambardar-Appointment-Extent of property in estate, one of the factors to be taken into consideration-Collector appointing candidate as Lambardar after considering all matters Commissioner not to upset order of Collector and appoint candidate holding larger area. Mashir Ali v. Chiragh Khan P L D 1950 Ph. (Rev.) 925 rel. ORDER This is a second appeal regarding the Lambardari of Chak No. 158-A/10-R, District Multan. The Collector on the recom mendations of the officers below appointed the appellant Fateh Din on the ground of his personal services ; he was an ex-soldier having served as a Havaldar for a considerable period and had acted satisfactorily as a temporary Lambardar. The learned Commissioner intervened in appeal in favour of the respondent Nur Muhammad on the sole ground that he was the owner of a considerably larger area. Fateh Din has come up in second appeal. The main point that has been urged is that the mere fact that Nur Muhammad was the owner of a much larger holding than Fateh Din, is not sufficient for setting aside the latter's appointment. Reliance in this connection is placed on Mashir Ali v. Malik Chirag Khan (P L D 1950 Ph. (Rev.) 950) a ruling which has…