| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1962 SLG = 1962 SLD 2565 = 1962 PLD 19 |
West Pakistan
Revision Side No. 74/110 of 1960-61, decided on 24th February 1961, District Sheikhupura.
Presented By: Nasir Ahmed, Member Board of Revenue
Muhammad Shafi for Appellant. Altaf-ur-Rehman for
Respondent.
Revision Side No. 74/110 of 1960-61, decided on 24th February 1961, District Sheikhupura.
Presented By: Nasir Ahmed, Member Board of Revenue
Muhammad Shafi for Appellant. Altaf-ur-Rehman for
Respondent.
ABDULLAH KHAN-Appellant
VERSUS
GHULAM HAIDER-Respondent
Law:
Section:
Lambardar - Appointment - Standard of education of candidates - No real difference between Primary or Middle standards. Lambardar-Appointment-Order of Collector neither perverse nor foolish-Not to be interfered with. Mashir Ali v. Chiragh Khan P L D 1950 Pb. (Rev.) 925 rel. Lambardar-Appointment-Candidate may apply direct to Collector any time before he finally makes appointment. Lambardar-Appointment-Being a member of Lambardar family is merely one of the matters to be taken into consideration at time of appointment ORDER The appellant, Abdullah Khan, was appointed by the Collector as Lambardar of Chak No. 14/R. B. District Sheikhupura. The learned Additional Commissioner intervened on appeal in favour of the respondent Ghulam Hyder primarily on two grounds. Firstly, that Abdullah Khan had applied for the post after the Tehsildar and the Revenue Assistant had made their recommendations to the Collector ; and secondly that Ghulam Hyder belonged to a Lambardar family and was read upto the middle standard whereas Abdullah Khan was only primary pass. These grounds neither separately nor together are sufficient to justify interference by the learned Additional Commissioner. Following Mashir Ali v. Chiragh Khan reported in (P L D 1950 Pb. (Rev.) 925) the general practice has been to respect the decision of the Collector in Lambardari…